Forty-eight rats were tested in conditioning, extinction and spontaneous recovery with levels of response-produced light or no light across the factors. The results indicated that response-produced light is rewarding as a function of its novelty when presented during the test for spontaneous recovery. Light presented in extinction depressed responding in recovery, an effect which was inhibited when light was presented during conditioning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarnesG. W.KishG. B.On some properties of visual reinforcement. Amer. Psychologist, 1958, 13, 417. (Abstract).
2.
BershP. J.The influence of two variables upon the establishment of a secondary reinforcement for operant responses. J. exp. Psychol., 1951, 41, 62–73.
3.
BugelskiR.Extinction with and without sub-goal reinforcement. J. comp. Psychol., 1938, 26, 121–134.
4.
CrowderW. F.MorrisJ. B.DyerW. R.RobinsonJ. V.Resistance to extinction and number of weak light reinforcements. J. Psychol., 1961, 51, 361–364.
5.
DinsmoorJ. A.A quantitative comparison of the discriminative and reinforcing functions of a stimulus. J. exp. Psychol., 1950, 40, 458–472.
6.
ForgaysD. G.LevinH.Learning as a function of change in sensory stimulation in food deprived and food satiated animals. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1958, 51, 50–54.
7.
GirdnerJ. B.An experimental analysis of the behavioral effects of a perceptual consequence unrelated to organic drive states. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Duke Univer., 1953.
8.
HurwitzH. M. B.Conditioned responses in rats reinforced by light. Brit. J. anim. Behav., 1956, 4, 31–33.
9.
KishG. B.Learning when the onset of illumination is used as a reinforcing stimulus. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1955, 48, 261–264.
10.
KishG. B.BaronA.Satiation of a sensory reinforcement. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1962, 55, 1007–1010.
11.
LockardR. B.Self-regulated exposure to light by albino rats as a function of rearing luminance and test luminance. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1963, 56, 558–564.
12.
MarxM. H.HendersonR. L.RobertsC. L.Positive reinforcement of the bar-pressing response by a light stimulus following dark operant pretests with no aftereffect. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1955, 48, 73–75.
13.
MilesR. G.The relative effectiveness of secondary reinforcement throughout deprivation and habit strength parameters. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1956, 49, 126–130.
14.
MyersJ. L.Secondary reinforcement: a review of recent experimentation. Psychol. Bull., 1958, 55, 284–299.
15.
NortonA.An empirical investigation of some effects of non-normality and heterogeneity on the F-distribution. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State Univer. of Iowa, 1952.
