The purpose of this study was to determine the effects on achievement and retention in spelling of the practice of errors contrasted with the practice of correct spellings. The findings fail to support the beta hypothesis. All group means on a posttest and on a retention test reflected higher achievement for the initial treatment experienced rather than for treatment per se.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AngellD.TerryD. F.Response guidance, response-term similarity and test type in the learning and retention of word pairs. Pittsburgh: Amer. Inst. for Res., 1962.
2.
CarrH. A.Teaching and learning. J. genet. Psychol., 1930, 37, 189–218.
3.
DunlapK.Habits: their making and unmaking. New York: Liveright, 1932.
4.
EvansJ. L.GlaserR.HommeL. E.The ruleg system for the construction of programmed verbal learning sequences. Pittsburgh: Dept. of Psychol., Univer. of Pittsburgh. Report under Coop. Res. Proj. No. 691(9417), 1960.
5.
HolsoppleJ. A.VanouseI.A note on the beta hypothesis of learning. Sch. & Soc., 1929, 29, 15–16.
6.
KeislarE. R.The development of understanding in arithmetic by a teaching machine. In LumsdaineA. A.GlaserR. (Eds.), Teaching machines and programmed learning. Washington, D. C.: Nat. Educ. Assn, 1960. Pp. 425–437.
7.
KelloggW. N.WhiteR. E.A maze test of Dunlap's theory of learning. J. comp. Psychol., 1935, 19, 119–148.
8.
McGeochJ. A.IrionA. L.The psychology of human learning. New York; Longmans, Green, 1960.
9.
MeyerS. R.Report on the initial test of a junior high-school vocabulary program, In LumsdaineA. A.GlaserR. (Eds.), Teaching machines and programmed learning. Washington, D. C.: Nat. Educ. Assn, 1960. Pp. 229–247.
10.
PetersonJ.Learning when frequency and recency factors are negative. J. exp. Psychol., 1922, 5, 270–300.
11.
SkinnerB. F.Teaching machines. In LumsdaineA. A.GlaserR. (Eds.), Teaching machines and programmed learning: a source book. Washington, D. C.: Nat. Educ. Assn, 1960. Pp. 137–159.
12.
StolurowL. M.Teaching by machine. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Printing Office, 1962.
13.
WakemanG. A.“A quantitative experiment on Dr. Dunlap's ‘Revision of the fundamental law of habit formation.’ ”J. comp. Psychol., 1930, 14, 235–236.
