Effect of UCS Duration on Classical Avoidance Learning of the Bar-Press Response

Abstract

It was found that rats perform better in a classical avoidance situation when the maximum duration of the UCS on no-response trials is long than when it is short. Although this effect was significant, it cannot account for the generally poor performance obtained. A competing response interpretation is proposed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dinsmoor

J. A.

Hughes

L. H.

Training rats to press a bar to turn off shock. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1956, 49, 235–238.

Hoffman

H. S.

Fleshler

Chorney

Discriminated bar-press avoidance. J. exp. Anal. Behav., 1961, 4, 309–316.

Kamin

L. J.

The effects of termination of the CS and avoidance of the US on avoidance learning. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1956, 49, 420–424.

Meyer

D. R.

Cho

Weseman

A. S.

On problems of conditioning discriminated lever-press avoidance responses. Psychol. Rev., 1960, 67, 224–228.

Pearl

Avoidance learning in rodents: a comparative study. Psychol. Rep., 1963, 12, 139–145.

Pearl

Edwards

R. E.

Delayed avoidance conditioning: warning stimulus (CS) duration. Psychol. Rep., 1962, 11, 375–380.

Schoenfeld

W. N.

An experimental approach to anxiety, escape and avoidance. In Hoch

P. H.

Zubin

(Eds.), Anxiety. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1950. Pp. 70–99.

Sidman

Avoidance conditioning with brief shock, and no exteroceptive warning signal. Science, 1953, 118, 157–158.