A literature review indicates that hypnosis can be measured reliably. The various predictors include general S-variables, test variables, and personality variables. There are no cross-validated predictors and little positive correlation between the common personality and S-variables. Consequently, hypnotizability may be an independent variable. A two-factor hypothesis is suggested, tranceability, the ability to have hypnotic experiences, and a non-ability factor composed of needs, motives, and attitudes toward hypnosis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AsA.A factor analytic study of some subjective personal experiences and their bearing on theories of hypnosis. Acta Psychol., 1962, 20, 196–209. (a)
2.
AsA.Nonhypnotic experiences related to hypnotizability in male and female college students. Scand. J. Psychol., 1962, 3, 112–121. (b)
3.
AsA.Hypnotizability as a function of nonhypnotic experiences. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1963, 66, 142–150.
4.
AsA., & LauerL. W.A factor analytic study of hypnotizability and related personal experiences. Int. J. clin. exp. Hyp., 1962, 10, 169–181.
5.
AsA.O'HaraJ., & MungerM.The measurement of subjective experiences presumably related to hypnotic susceptibility. Scand. J. Psychol., 1962, 3, 47–64.
6.
BarberT. X.A note on hypnotizability and personality traits. Int. J. clin. exp. Hyp., 1956, 4, 109–114.
7.
BarryH.Jr.MacKinnonD. W., & MurrayH. A.Jr.Studies in personality: A. Hypnotizability as a personality trait and its typological relations. Hum. Biol., 1931, 3, 1–36.
8.
BartlettM. R.Relation of suggestibility to other personality traits. J. gen. Psychol., 1936, 15, 191–196.
9.
BaumgartnerM.The correlation of direct suggestibility with certain character traits. J. appl. Psychol., 1931, 15, 1–15.
BentonA. L., & BanduraA.“Primary” and “secondary” suggestibility. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1953, 48, 336–340.
12.
BrenmanM., & ReichardS.Use of the Rorschach test in the prediction of hypnotizability. Bull. Menninger Clin., 1943, 7, 183–187.
13.
CooperG. W.Jr., & DanaR. H.Hypnotizability and the Maudsley Personality Invenrory. Int. J. clin. exp. Hyp., in press.
14.
CurtisJ. W.A study of the relationship between hypnotic susceptibility and intelligence. J. exp. Psychol., 1943, 43, 337–339.
15.
DanaR. H., & CooperG. W.Jr.Susceptibility to hypnosis and TAT card 12M. Amer. J. clin. Hyp., 1964, 6, 208–211.
16.
DavisL. W., & HusbandR. W.A study of hypnotic susceptibility in relation to personality traits. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1931, 26, 175–182.
17.
EysenckH. J.Suggestibility and hysteria. J. Neurol. Psychiat., 1943, 6, 22–31.
18.
EysenckH. J.States of high suggestibility and the neuroses. Amer. J. Psychol., 1944, 57, 406–411.
19.
EysenckH. J.Dimensions of personality.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1947.
20.
EysenckH. J., & FurneauxW. D.Primary and secondary suggestibility: an experimental and statistical study. J. exp. Psychol., 1945, 35, 485–503.
21.
FawV., & WilcoxW. W.Personality characteristics of susceptible and unsusceptible hypnotic subjects. J. clin. exp. Hyp., 1958, 6, 83–94.
22.
FriedlanderJ. W., & SarbinT. R.The depth of hypnosis. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1938, 33, 453–475.
23.
GillM. M., & BrenmanM.Hypnosis and related states.New York: International Universities Press, 1961.
24.
HatfieldE. C.The validity of the LeCron method of evaluating hypnotic depth. Int. J. clin. exp. Hyp., 1961, 9, 215–221.
25.
HeilizerF.An exploration of the relationship between hypnotizability and anxiety and/or neuroticism. J. consult. Psychol., 1960, 24, 432–436.
26.
HilgardE. R., & BentlerP. M.Predicting hypnotizability from the Maudsley Personality Inventory. Brit. J. Psychol., in press.
27.
HilgardE. R., & LauerL. W.Lack of correlation between the California Psychological Inventory and hypnotic susceptibility. J. consult. Psychol., 1962, 26, 331–335.
28.
HilgardE. R.WeitzenhofferA. M.LandesJ., & MooreR. K.The distribution of susceptibility to hypnosis in a student population: a study using the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale. Psychol. Monogr., 1961, 75, No. 8 (Whole No. 512).
29.
HimmelweitH. T.DesaiM., & PetrieA.An experimental investigation of neuroticism. J. Pers., 1946, 15, 173–196.
30.
HullC. L.Hypnosis and suggestibility: an experimental approach.New York: Appleton, 1933.
31.
LangP. J., & LazovikA. D.Personality and hypnotic susceptibility. J. consult. Psychol., 1962, 26, 317–322.
32.
LeCronL. M.A method of measuring the depth of hypnosis. J. clin. exp. Hyp., 1953, 1, 4–7.
33.
LeCronL. M., & BordeauxJ.Hypnotism today.New York: Grune & Stratton, 1947.
34.
LevittE. E.BradyJ. P., & LubinB.Correlates of hypnotizability in young women: anxiety and dependency. J. Pers., 1963, 31, 52–57.
35.
LevittE. E.LubinB., & BradyJ. P.The effect of the pseudovolunteer on studies of volunteers for psychology experiments. J. appl. Psychol., 1962, 46, 72–75.
36.
LevittE. E.LubinB., & ZuckermanM.Note on the attitude toward hypnosis of volunteers and nonvolunteers for an hypnosis experiment. Psychol. Rep., 1959, 5, 712.
37.
MesserA. L.HickleyE. D., & MosierC. I.Suggestibility and neurotic symptoms in normal subjects. J. gen. Psychol, 1938, 19, 391–399.
38.
PattieF. A.Methods of induction, susceptibility of subjects and criteria of hypnosis. In DorcusR. M. (Ed.), Hypnosis and its therapeutic applications.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956. Ch. 2.
39.
RosenzweigS., & SarasonS.An experimental study of the triadic hypothesis: reaction to frustration, ego-defense, and hypnotizability: I. Correlational approach. Charact. & Pers., 1942, 11, 1–19.
40.
SarasonS., & RosenzweigS.An experimental study of the triadic hypothesis: reaction to frustration, ego-defense, and hypnotizability: II. Thematic apperception approach. Charact. & Pers., 1942, 11, 150–165.
41.
SarbinT. R.Contributions to role-taking theory: I. Hypnotic behavior. Psychol. Rev., 1950, 57, 225–270.
42.
SarbinT. R., & MadowL. W.Predicting the depth of hypnosis by means of the Rorschach test. Amer. J. Onhopsychiat., 1942, 12, 268–271.
43.
SchulmanR. E., & LondonP.Hypnotic susceptibility and MMPI profiles. J. consult. Psychol., 1963, 27, 157–161.
44.
SecterI. I.Personality factors of the MMPI and hypnotizability. Amer. J. clin, Hyp., 1961, 3, 185–188. (a)
45.
SecterI. I.TAT card 12 M as a predictor of hypnotizability. Amer. J. clin. Hyp., 1961, 3, 179–184. (b)
46.
ShorR. E., & OrneE. C.The Harvard Group Scale: an adaptation for group administration with self-report scoring of the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form A.Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Med. School, 1962.
47.
ShorR. E.OrneM. T., & O'ConnellD. N.Validation and cross-validation of a scale of self reported personal experiences which predicts hypnotizability. J. Psychol., 1962, 53, 55–75.
48.
SteiselI. M.The Rorschach test and suggestibility. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1952, 47, 607–614.
49.
VenturP.KransdorffM., & KlineM. V.A differential study of emotional attitudes toward hypnosis with Card 12M of the Thematic Apperception Test. Brit. J. med. Hyp., 1956, 8, 5–14.
50.
WatkinsJ. G.Hypnotherapy of war neuroses.New York: Ronald, 1949.
51.
WeitzenhofferA. M.Hypnotism: an objective study in suggestibility.New York: Wiley, 1953.
52.
WeitzenhofferA. M.Hypnotic susceptibility as related to masculinity-femininity. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Univer. of Michigan, 1956.
