The previously reported interaction of rated on-the-job creativity and test instructions was found to be relatively unaffected by the judges' professional training and markedly reduced by apparent differences in Ss' extra-experimental milieu.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ChrtstensenR. P.GuilfordJ. P., & WilsonR. C.Relation of creative responses to working time and instructions. J. exp. Psychol., 1957, 53, 82–88.
2.
DattaL.Test instructions and the identification of creative scientific talent. Psychol. Rep,.1963, 13, 495–500.
3.
HymanR.Some experiments in creativity.New York: General Electric Co., Behavioral Research Service, 1960.
4.
LongeneckerE. D.Perceptual recognition as a function of anxiety, motivation and the testing situation. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1962, 64, 215–221.
5.
ParnesS. J., & MeadowsA.Effects of “brainstorming” instructions on creative problem-solving by trained and untrained subjects. J. educ. Psychol., 1959, 50, 171–176.
6.
SarasonL. G.Effect of anxiety and two kinds of motivating conditions on verbal learning. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1957, 54, 166–171.
7.
SarasonL. G.The effect of anxiety and threat on the solution of a difficult task. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1961, 62, 165–168.
