Three groups of hooded rats were tested in a Skinner box with light reinforcement, using two intensity levels and both fixed and variable light locations after dark operant pretests. The results lend support both to a stimulus satiation hypothesis and to an optimal stimulation hypothesis. It is suggested that intensity and light location are potent variables which have opposite effects on response level, intensity showing relatively more rapid effects.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DemberW. N., & EarlR. W.Analysis of exploratory, manipulative, and curiosity behavior. Psychol. Rev., 1957, 64, 91–96.
2.
DuncanC. P.On the similarity between reactive inhibition and neural satiation. Amer. J. Psychol., 1956, 69, 227–235.
3.
GlanzerM.Stimulus satiation: an explanation of spontaneous alternation and related phenomena. Psychol. Rev., 1953, 60, 257–268.
LeubaC.Toward some integration of learning theories: the concept of optimal stimulation. Psychol. Rep., 1955, 1, 27–33.
9.
MarxM. H.HendersonR. L., & RobertsC. L.Partial reinforcement of the bar pressing response by a light stimulus following dark operant pretests with no aftereffect. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1955, 48, 73–79.
10.
StewartJ.Reinforcing effects of light as a function of intensity and reinforcement schedule. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1960, 53, 187–193.
