A Markov model for verbal learning, developed by Miller and McGill, was applied to data from a serial learning experiment. Data were obtained from 38 retarded Ss (Mean MA: 105 mo.; Mean IQ: 66) who learned lists of six common monosyllabic words by the anticipation method. The model, which assumes that probability of recall is completely determined by number of previous recalls, corresponded closely to the data. The results were also consistent with Rock's theory that associations are formed in an all-or-nothing fashion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ClarkL. L.LansfordT. G., & DallenbachK. M.Repetition and associative learning. Amer. J. Psychol., 1960, 73, 22–40.
2.
EstesW. K.Learning theory and the new “mental chemistry.”Psychol. Rev., 1960, 67, 207–223.
3.
EstesW. K.New developments in statistical behavior theory: differential tests of axioms for associative learning. Psychometrika, 1961, 26, 73–84.
4.
EstesW. K.HopkinsB. L., & CrothersE. J.All-or-none and conservation effects in the learning and retention of paired associates. J. exp. Psychol., 1960, 60, 329–339.
5.
HullC. L.HovlandC. I.RossR. T.HallM.PerkinsD. T., & FitchF. B.Mathematico-deductive theory of rote learning: a study in scientific methodology.New Haven: Yale Univer. Press, 1940.
6.
MillerG. A., & McGillW. J.A statistical description of verbal learning. Psychometrika, 1952, 17, 369–396.
7.
RockI.The role of repetition in associative learning. Amer. J. Psychol., 1957, 70, 186–193.
8.
RockI., & HeimerW.Further evidence of one-trial associative learning. Amer. J. Psychol., 1959, 72, 1–16.
9.
UnderwoodB. J.Speed of learning and amount retained: a consideration of methodology. Psychol. Bull., 1954, 51, 276–282.
10.
UnderwoodB. J.RehulaR., & KeppelG.Item-selection in paired-associate learning. Amer. J. Psychol., 1962, 75, 353–371.
11.
WilliamsJ. P.Supplementary report: a selection artifact in Rock's study of the role of repetition. J. exp. Psychol., 1961, 62, 627–628.
