Acquisition of a conditioned avoidance response has been demonstrated in the guppy. Although no reliable differences were observed between the three CS-US intervals used, the trend of the data showing that fewer trials are required to reach criterion with longer CS-US intervals supports similar observations reported for other species of fish. The use of the guppy for studies of behavioral genetics and behavioral teratology has been considered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BehrendE. R., & BittermanM. E.Avoidance-conditioning in the goldfish: exploratory studies of the CS-US interval. Amer. J. Psychol., 1962, 75, 18–34.
2.
BergL. S.Classification of fishes both recent and fossil.Ann Arbor: Edwards, 1947.
3.
BittermanM. E.Toward a comparative psychology of learning. Amer. Psychologist, 1960, 15, 704–712.
4.
CuttingW.BaslowM.ReadD., & FurstA.The use of fish in the evaluation of drugs affecting the central nervous system. J. clin. exp. Psychopathol. & Quart. Rev. Psychiat. Neurol., 1959, 20, 26–32.
5.
HornerJ. L.LongoN., & BittermanM. E.A shuttle box for fish and a control circuit of general applicability. Amer. J, Psychol., 1961, 74, 114–120.
6.
KelloggW. N., & GavinJ.Maze-learning in the guppy. Psychol. Rep., 1960, 6, 445–446.
7.
RazranG.Recent Soviet phyletic comparisons of classical and of operant conditioning: experimental designs. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1961, 54, 357–365.
8.
SiegelS.Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.
9.
UmbreitW. W., & KellerD. L.Simple tools for the study of behavior. Scientia, 1959, 94, 225–229.
10.
WodinskyJ.BehrendE. R., & BittermanM. E.Avoidance-conditioning in two species of fish. Anim. Behav., 1962, 10, 76–78.
