Acquiescence and Social Desirability Response Styles,Item Characteristics,and Conformity

Asch S. E. Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In Maccoby E. Newcomb T. M. , & Hartley E. L. (Eds.), Readings in social psychology. (3rd ed.) New York: Holt, 1958. Pp. 174–183.

Banta T. J. Social attitudes and response styles. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1961, 21, 543–557.

Barron F. Complexity-simplicity as a personality dimension. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1953, 48, 163–172.

Bass B. M. Authoritarianism or acquiescence? J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1955, 61, 616–623.

Bass B. M. Development and evaluation of a scale for measuring social acquiescence. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1956, 53, 296–299.

Bendig A. W. A factor analysis of “social desirability,” “defensiveness,” “lie,” and “acquiescence” scales. J. gen. Psychol., 1962, 66, 129–136.

Berg I. A. , & Bass B. M. (Eds.) Conformity and deviation. New York: Harper, 1961.

Blake R. R. Helson H. , & Mouton J. S. The generality of conformity behavior as a function of factual anchorage, difficulty of task, and amount of social pressure. J. Pers., 1956, 25, 294–305.

Chapman L. J. , & Bock R. D. Components of variance due to acquiescence and content in the F scale measure of authoritarianism. Psychol. Bull., 1958, 55, 328–333.

Comrey A. L. A factor analysis of items on the MMPI depression scale. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1957, 17, 578–585. (a)

Comrey A. L. A factor analysis of items on the MMPI hypochondriasis scale. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1957, 17, 568–577. (b)

Comrey A. L. A factor analysis of items on the MMPI hysteria scale. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1957, 17, 586–592. (c)

Comrey A. L. A factor analysis of items on the MMPI F scale. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1958, 18,621–632. (a)

Comrey A. L. A factor analysis of items on the MMPI hypomania scale. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1958, 18, 313–323. (b)

Comrey A. L. A factor analysis of items on the MMPI K scale, Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1958, 18, 633–639. (c)

Comrey A. L. A factor analysis of items on the MMPI paranoia scale. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1958, 18, 99–107. (d)

Comrey A. L. A factor analysis of items on the MMPI psychasthenia scale. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1958, 18, 293–300. (e)

Comrey A. L. A factor analysis of items on the MMPI psychopathic deviate scale. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1958, 18, 91–98. (f)

Comrey A. L. , & Marggraff W. M. A factor analysis of items on the MMPI schizophrenia scale. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1958, 18, 301–311.

Couch A. , & Keniston K. Yeasayers and naysayers: agreeing response set as a personality variable. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1960, 60, 151–174.

Couch A. , & Keniston K. Agreeing response set and social desirability. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1961, 62, 175–179.

Cronbach L. J. Response sets and test validity. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1946, 6, 475–494.

Cronbach L. J. Further evidence on response sets and test design. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1950, 10, 3–31.

Crowne D. P. , & Marlowe D. A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. J. consult. Psychol., 1960, 24, 349–354.

Dale E. , & Chall J. S. A formula for predicting readability. Educ. res. Bull., 1948, 27, 11–20.

Darley J. G. , & McNamara W. J. Manual for the Minnesota Personality Scale. New York: Psychological Corp., 1941.

Desoto C. B. Kuethe J. L. , & Bosley J. J. A redefinition of social desirability. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1959, 58, 273–275.

Edwards A. L. The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. New York: Dryden, 1957.

Edwards A. L. Social desirability or acquiescence in the MMPI? A case study with the SD scale. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1961, 63, 351–359.

Elliott L. L. Effects of item construction and respondent aptitude on response acquiescence. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1961, 21, 405–415.

Endler N. S. Conformity analyzed and related to personality. J. soc. Psychol., 1961, 53, 271–283.

Ferguson L. W. A revision of the primary social attirudes scale. J. Psychol., 1944 17, 229–241.

Flesch R. A new readability yardstick. J. appl. Psychol., 1948, 32, 221–233.

Forehand G. A. Relationships among response sets and cognitive behaviors. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1962, 22, 287–302.

Foster R. J. Acquiescent response set as a measure of acquiescence. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1961,63, 155–160.

Gage N. L. Leavitt G. S. , & Stone G. C. The psychological meaning of acquiescence set for authoritarianism. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1957, 55, 98–103.

Hanley C. Deriving a measure of test taking defensiveness. J. consult. Psychol., 1957, 21, 391–397.

Hanley C. Responses to the wording of personality test items. J. consult. Psychol. 1959, 23, 261–265.

Husek T. R. Acquiescence as a response set and as a personality characteristic. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1961, 21, 295–308.

Jackson D. N. Stability in resistance to field forces. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue Univer., 1955.

Jackson D. N. Cognitive energy level, acquiescence, and authoritarianism. J. soc. Psychol., 1959, 59, 65–69.

Jackson D. N. Stylistic response determinants in the California Psychological Inventory. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1960, 20, 339–346.

Jackson D. N. , & Messick S. Content and style in personality assessment. Psychol. Bull., 1958, 55, 243–252.

Jackson D. N. , & Messick S. Acquiescence and desirability as response determinants on the MMPI. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1961, 21, 771–790.

Jackson D. N. , & Messick S. Response styles on the MMPI: comparison of clinical and normal samples. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1962, 65, 285–299.

Jones M. B. Authoritarianism and intolerance of fluctuation. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1955, 50, 125–126.

Levy L. A study of some personality attributes of independents and conformers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univer. of Washington, 1958.

Lorge I. Gen-like: halo or reality. Psychol. Bull., 1937, 34, 545–546. (Abstract)

Marlowe D. , & Crwowne D. P. Social desirability and response to perceived situational demands. J. consult. Psychol., 1961, 25, 109–115.

McGee R. K. The relationship between response style and personality variables: I. The measurement of response acquiescence. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1962, 64, 229–233. (a)

McGee R. K. The relationship between response style and personality variables: II. The prediction of independent conformity behavior. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1962, 65, 347–351. (b)

Messick S. The Social Desirability Variable in Personality Assessment and Research. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1959, 19, 451–454. (Review)

Messick S. Response style and content measures from personality inventories. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1962, 22, 41–56.

Newcomb T. M. Personality and social change. New York: Dryden, 1943.

Nunnally J. C. , & Husek T. R. The phony language examination: an approach to the measurement of response bias. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1958, 18, 275–282.

Orne M. T. On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: with particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. Amer. Psychologist, 1962, 17, 776–783.

Peabody D. Attitude content and agreement set in scales of authoritarianism, dogmatism, anti-Semitism, and economic conservatism. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1961, 63, 1–11.

Rosen E. Self appraisal, personal desirability, and perceived social desirability of personality traits. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1956, 52, 151–158.

Small D. O. , & Campbell D. T. The effect of acquiescence response-set upon the relationship of the F scale and conformity. Sociometry, 1960, 23, 69–71.

Stricker L. J. Some item charactetistics that evoke acquiescent and social desirability response sets on psychological scales. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York Univer., 1961.

Taylor J. B. Social desirability and MMPI performance: the individual case. J. consult. Psychol., 1959, 23, 514–517.

Voas R. B. Relationships among three types of response sets. Pensacola, Fla.: Naval School of Aviation Medicine, 1958. (Rep. No. 15)

Wiggins J. S. A review of Edwards, A. L. The Social Desirability variable in Personality Assessment and Research. Contemp. Psychol., 1958, 3, 326–328.

Wiggins J. S. Interrelationships among MMPI measures of dissimulation under standard and social desirability instructions. J. consult. Psychol., 1959, 23, 419–427.