AdolphE. F.Thirst and its inhibition in the stomach. Amer. J. Physiol., 1950, 161, 374–386.
2.
BellowsJ. R.Time factors in water drinking in dogs. Amer. J. Physiol., 1939, 121, 87–97.
3.
BerkunM. M.KessenM. L., & MillerN. E.Hunger-reducing effects of food by stomach fistula versus food by mouth measured by a consummatory response. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1952, 45, 550–554.
4.
EpsteinA. N.Water intake without the act of drinking. Science, 1960, 131, 497–498.
5.
HullC. L.LivingstonJ. R.RouseR. O., & BarkerA. N.True, sham, and esophageal feeding as reinforcements. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1951, 44, 236–245.
6.
JamesW. T.An apparatus for the investigation of an operant response for sham feeding versus direct stomach feeding in the dog. Psychol. Rep., 1962, 11, 67–70.
7.
JamesW. T., & GilbertT. F.Elimination of eating behavior by food injection in weaned puppies. Psychol. Rep., 1957, 3, 167–168.
8.
JanowitzH. D., & GrossmanM. I.Some factors affecting the food intake in normal dogs with esophagotomy and gastric fistula. Amer. J. Physiol., 1959, 159, 143–145.
9.
KohnM.Satiation of hunger from food injected directly into the stomach versus food injected by mouth. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1951, 44, 412–422.
10.
MillerN. E., & KessenM. L.Reward effects of food via stomach fistula compared with those of food via mouth. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1952, 45, 555–564.
11.
MillerN. E.SamplerR. I., & WoodrowP.Thirst-reducing effects of water by stomach versus water by mouth measured by both a consummatory and instrumental response. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1957, 50, 1–5.
12.
PfaffmannC.The pleasures of sensation. Psychol. Rev., 1960, 67, 253–268.
13.
TowbinE. J.Thirst in esophagostomized dogs. Amer. J. Physiol., 1949, 159, 533–541.