Ability to Resist Suggestions within the Hypnotic State: Responsiveness to Conflicting Communications

Barber T. X. Antisocial and criminal acts induced by “hypnosis.” Arch. gen. Psychiat., 1961, 5, 301–312.

Bentler P. M. , & Hilgard E. R. A comparison of group and individual induction of hypnosis with self-scoring and observer-scoring. Int. J. clin. exp. Hyp., 1962, in press.

Haley J. D. An interactional explanation of hypnosis. Amer. J. clin. Hyp., 1958, 1, 41–57.

Hilgard E. R. , & Hommel L. S. Selective amnesia for events within hypnosis in relation to repression. J. Pers., 1961, 29, 205–216.

Miller G. A. Galanter E. , & Pribram K. H. Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, 1960.

Orne M. T. Antisocial behavior and hypnosis. AFOSR Technical Report 1205. Boston, Mass.: Studies in Hypnosis Project, Harvard Medical School, 1961.

Shor R. E. , & Orne E. C. Adaptation for group administration with self-report scoring of the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form A. Boston, Mass.: Studies in Hypnosis Project, Harvard Medical School, 1962.

Weitzenhoffer A. M. , & Hilgard E. R. Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale. Palo Alto, Calif.: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1959.

Wells W. R. Ability to resist artificially induced dissociation. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1940, 35, 261–272.

White R. W. An analysis of motivation in hypnosis. J. gen. Psychol., 1941, 24, 145–162.

Young P. C. Is rapport an essential characteristic of hypnosis? J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1927, 22, 130–139.

Young P. C. The nature of hypnosis: as indicated by the presence or absence of posthypnotic amnesia and rapport. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1928, 22, 372–382.