Comparison of the Effectiveness of a Programed Text with Three other Methods of Presentation

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahmann

J. S.

, & Glock

M. D.

Evaluating pupil growth. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1959.

Amer. Psychologist, 1961, 16, 512.

Della-Piana

An experimental evaluation of programed learning. Paper read at Amer. Educ. Res. Assn, Atlantic City, February, 1962.

Evans

Glaser

, & Homme

A preliminary investigation of variation in the properties of verbal learning sequences of the teaching machines type. Paper read at East. Psychol. Assn, Atlantic City, April, 1959.

Federer

Experimental design: theory and application. New York: MacMillan, 1955.

Hartley

The maximum F ratio as a short-cut test for heterogeneity of variance. Biometrika, 1950, 37, 306–312.

Holland

Design and use of a teaching machine program. Paper read at Amer. Psychol. Assn, September, 1960.

Krumboltz

, & Weisman

The effect of overt versus covert responding to programed instruction on immediate and delayed retention. J. educ. Psychol., 1962, 53, 89–92.

Morrill

Teaching machines: a review. Psychol. Bull., 1961, 58, 363–375.

10.

Ripple

Programed instruction: a new approach to teaching and learning. Cornell Univer.: Author, 1962.

11.

Silberman

Self-teaching devices and programed materials. Rev. educ. Res., 1962, 32, 179–193.

12.

Stolurow

Teaching by machine. (Coop. Res. Monogr. No. 6, OE 34010) Washington: U. S. Gov't Print. Off., 1961.