BaileyC. J., & MillerN. E.The effect of sodium amytal on an approach-avoidance conflict in cats. J. exp. Psychol., 1952, 45, 205–208.
2.
BarryH.III, & MillerN. E.Effects of drugs on approach-avoidance conflict tested repeatedly by means of a “telescope alley.”J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1962, 55, 201–210.
3.
DinsmoorJ. A., & LyonD. O.The selective action of chlorpromazine on behavior suppressed by punishment. Psychopharmacologia, 1961, 2, 456–460.
4.
EstesW. K., & SkinnerB. F.Some quantitative properties of anxiety. J. exp. Psychol., 1941, 29, 390–400.
5.
GellerI., & SeifterJ.The effects of meprobamate, barbiturates, d-amphetamine and promazine on experimentally induced conflict in the rat. Psychopharmacologia, 1960, 1, 482–492.
6.
GrossmanS. P.Effects of chlorpromazine and perphenazine on bar-pressing performance in an approach-avoidance conflict. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1961, 54, 517–521.
7.
HeistadG. T.Effects of chlorpromazine and electroconvulsive shock on a conditioned emotional response. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1958, 51, 209–212.
8.
HuntH. F.JernbergP., & BradyJ. V.The effect of electroconvulsive shock (ECS) on a conditioned emotional response: the effect of post-ECS extinction on the reappearance of the response. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1952, 45, 589–599.
9.
JacobsenE., & SkaarupY.Experimental induction of conflict-behavior in cats: the effect of some anticholinergic compounds. Acta Pharmacol. & toxicol., 1955, 11, 125–134.
10.
MassermanJ. H.Drug effects on experimental neuroses in animals. In UhrL. & MillerJ. G. (Eds.), Drugs and behavior.New York: Wiley, 1960. Pp. 250–254.
11.
MillerN. E.Objective techniques for studying motivational effects of drugs on animals. In GatattiniS. & GhettiV. (Eds.), Psychotropic drugs.Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1957. Pp. 83–103.
12.
NaessK., & RasmussenE. W.Approach-withdrawal responses and other specific behavior reactions as screening test for tranquillizers. Acta Pharmacol. & toxicol., 1958, 15, 99–114.
