GarrettH. F.A review and interpretation of investigations of factors related to scholastic success in colleges of arts and science and teachers colleges. J. exp. Educ., 1949, 18, 91–138.
8.
GoodsteinL. D.Regional differences in MMPI responses among male college students. J. consult. Psychol., 1954, 18, 437–441.
9.
GoodsteinL. D., & HeilbrunA. B.Prediction of college achievement from the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule at three levels of intellectual ability. J. appl. Psychol., 1962, 46, 317–320.
10.
HarrisD.Factors affecting college grades: a review of the literature, 1930-1937. Psychol. Bull., 1940, 37, 125–166.
11.
HathawayS. R.A coding system for MMPI profiles. J. consult. Psychol., 1947, 11, 334–337.
12.
HeilbrunA. B.The psychological significance of the MMPI K scale in a normal population. J. consult. Psychol., 1961, 25, 486–491.
13.
HollandJ. L.The prediction of college grades from the California Psychological Inventory and the Scholastic Aptitude Test. J. educ. Psychol., 1959, 50, 135–142.
14.
HoytD. P., & NormanW. T.Adjustment and academic predictability. J. counsel. Psychol., 1954, 1, 96–99.
15.
LaddC. E.DolchJ. P., & GoodsteinL. D.A minimal IBM 650 computer program for converting MMPI raw scores to T scores. Behav. Sci., 1960, 5, 268. (Abstract)
16.
LindquistE. E.Design and analysis of experiments.Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1953.
17.
McNemarQ.Psychological statistics. (3rd ed.) New York: Wiley, 1962.
18.
SternG. G.SteinM. I., & BloomB. S.Methods in personality assessment: human behavior in complex social situations.Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1956.