CastanedaA., & PalermoD. S.Psychomotor performance as a function of amount of training and stress. J. exp. Psychol., 1955, 50, 175–179.
2.
ClarkR. E.The role of drive (time stress) in complex learning: an emphasis on pre-learning phenomena. J. exp. Psychol., 1962, 63, 57–61.
3.
CulbertsonF. M.Modification of an emotionally held attitude through role-playing. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1957, 54, 230–233.
4.
FestingerL.A theory of cognitive dissonance.Evanston, Ill.: Row, Peterson, 1957.
5.
FineB. J.Conclusion drawing, communicator credibility and anxiety as factors in opinion change. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1957, 54, 369–374.
6.
GoodrichK. P.Running speed and drinking rate as functions of sucrose concentration and amount of consummatory activity. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1960, 53, 245–250.
7.
GoodrichK. P.RossL. E., & WagnerA. R.Performance in eyelid conditioning following interpolated presentations of the UCS. J. exp. Psychol., 1957, 53, 214–217.
HovlandC. I., & MandellW.An experimental comparison of conclusion-drawing by the communicator and by the audience. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1952, 47, 581–588.
10.
HovlandC. I.MandellW.CampbellE. H.BrockT.LuchinsA. S.CohenA. R.McGuireW. J.JanisI. L.FeierabendR. L., & AndersonN. H.The order of presentation in persuasion.New Haven: Yale Univer. Press, 1957.
11.
HovlandC. I., & WeissW.The influence of source credibility of communication effectiveness. Publ. Opin. Quart., 1951, 15, 635–650.
JanisI. L.Motivational effects of different sequential arrangements of conflicting arguments: a theoretical analysis. In HovlandC. I., The order of presentation in persuasion.New Haven: Yale Univer. Press, 1957. Pp. 170–186.
17.
JanisI. L., & KingB. T.The influence of role-playing in opinion change. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1954, 49, 211–218.
18.
KelmanH. C., & HovlandC. I.“Reinstatement” of the communicator in the delayed measurement of opinion change. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1953, 48, 327–335.
19.
KendlerH. H., & LachmanR.Habit reversal as a function of schedule of reinforcement and drive strength. J. exp. Psychol., 1958, 55, 584–591.
20.
KerrickJ. S.The effects of intelligence and manifest anxiety on attitude change through communication. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univer. of Illinois, 1954.
21.
KerrickJ. S.The effect of relevant and non-relevant sources on attitude change. J. soc. Psychol., 1958, 47, 15–20.
22.
KimbleG. A.MannL. I., & DufortR. H.Classical and instrumental eyelid conditioning. J. exp. Psychol., 1955, 49, 407–417.
23.
KingB. T., & JanisI. L.Comparison of the effectiveness of improvised vs. non-improvised role-playing in producing opinion change. Hum. Relat., 1956, 9, 177–186
LoganF. A.BeierE., & EllisR. A.The effect of varied reinforcement on speed of locomotion. J. exp. Psychol., 1955, 49, 260–266.
28.
McGuireW. J.Order of presentation as a factor in “condirioning persuasiveness. In HovlandC. I., The order of presentation in persuasion.New Haven: Yale Univer. Press, 1957 Pp. 98–114.
29.
McGuireW. J.A syllogistic analysis of cognitive relationships. In RosenbergM. J.HovlandC. I.McGuireW. J.AbelsonR. P., and BrehmJ. W.. Attitude organization and change.New Haven: Yale Univer. Press, 1960. Pp. 65–111. (a)
30.
McGuireW. J.Cognitive consistency and attitude change. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1960, 60, 345–353. (b)
31.
McGuireW. J.Direct and indirect effects of dissonance-producing messages. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1960, 60, 354–358. (c)
32.
MillerN. E.Extensions of liberalized S-R theory. In KochS. (Ed.), Psychology: a study of a science. Study 1, Vol. 2. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959. Pp. 196–292.
33.
OsgoodC. E., & TannenbaumP.The principle of congruity and the prediction of attitude change. Psychol. Rev., 1955, 62, 42–55.
34.
PerkinsC. C.Jr.The relation between conditioned stimulus intensity and response strength. J. exp. Psychol., 1953, 46, 225–231.
35.
ReynoldsB.The acquisition of a trace conditioned reflex as a function of the magnitude of the stimulus trace. J. exp. Psychol., 1945, 35, 15–31.
36.
ReynoldsW. F., & PavlkW. B.Running speed as a function of deprivation period and reward magnitude. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1960, 53, 615–618.
37.
RossL. E., & SpenceK. W.Eyelid conditioning performance under partial reinforcement as a function of UCS intensity. J. exp. Psychol., 1960, 59, 379–382.
38.
RunquistW. N., & SpenceK. W.Performance in eyelid conditioning as a function of UCS duration. J. exp. Psychol., 1959, 57, 249–252.
39.
ScottW. A.Attitude change through reward of verbal behavior. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1957, 55, 72–75.
40.
ScottW. A.Attitude change by response reinforcement: replication and extension. Sociometry, 1959, 22, 328–335.
41.
SheffieldF. D., & RobyT. B.Reward value of non-nutritive sweet taste. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1950, 43, 471–481.
42.
SheffieldV. E.Resistance to extinction as a function of the distribution of extinction trials. J. exp. Psychol., 1950, 40, 305–313.
43.
SpenceK. W.Current interpretation of learning data and some recent developments in stimulus-response theory. In AdamsD. K., Learning theory, personality theory, and clinical research. (The Kentucky Symposium) New York: Wiley, 1954. Pp. 1–21.
44.
SpenceK. W.Behavior theory and conditioning.New Haven: Yale Univer. Press, 1956.
45.
SpenceK. W.HaggardD. F., & RossL. E.UCS intensity and associative (habit) strength of the eyelid CR. J. exp. Psychol., 1958, 55, 404–411.
46.
SpenceK. W., & NorrisE. B.Eyelid conditioning as a function of the inter-trial interval. J. exp. Psychol., 1950, 40, 716–720.
47.
SpenceK. W., & RossL. E.Experimental evidence on the relation between performance levels in eyelid conditioning and anxiety (drive) level.Office of Naval Research, Contract N9 Onr-93802, Technical Report 5, 1957.
48.
StaatsA. W., & StaatsC. K.Attitudes established by classical conditioning. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1958, 57, 37–40.
49.
StaatsA. W.StaatsC. K., & HeardW. G.Attitude development and ratio of reinforcement. Sociometry, 1960, 23, 338–350.
50.
TaylorJ. A.A personality scale of manifest anxiety. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1953, 48, 285–290.
51.
TaylorJ. A.Drive theory and manifest anxiety. Psychol. Bull., 1956, 53, 303–320.
52.
TeichnerW. H.Experimental extinction as a function of the intertrial intervals during conditioning and extinction. J. exp. Psychol., 1952, 44, 170–178.
53.
TrapoldM. A., & SpenceK. W.Performance changes in eyelid conditioning as related to the motivational and reinforcing properties of the UCS. J. exp. Psychol., 1960, 59, 209–213.
54.
WegnerN., & ZeamanD.Strength of cardiac conditioned responses with varying unconditioned stimulus durations. Psychol. Rev., 1958, 65, 238–241.
55.
WeissR. F.Deprivation and reward magnitude effects on speed throughout the goal gradient. J. exp. Psychol., 1960, 60, 384–390.
56.
WeissK. F.Response speed, amplitude, and resistance to extinction as joint functions of work and length of behavior chain. J. exp. Psychol., 1961, 61, 245–256.
57.
WeissR. F.RawsonH. E., & PaSamanickB.Argument strength, delay of argument and anxiety in the “conditioning” and “selective learning” of attitudes. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., in press.
58.
WeissW.Opinion congruence with a negative source on one issue as a factor influencing agreement on another issue. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1957, 54, 180–185.
59.
YamaguchiH. G.Drive (D) as a function of hours of hunger (h). J. exp. Psychol., 1951, 42, 108–117.