GrantD. A.HakeH. W.Dark adaptation and the Humphreys random reinforcement phenomenon in human eyelid conditioning. J. exp. Psychol., 1951, 42, 417–423.
2.
GrantD. A.RiOpelleA. J.HakeH. W.Resistance to extinction and the pattern of reinforcement: I. Alternation of reinforcement and the conditioned eyelid response. J. exp. Psychol., 1950, 40, 53–60.
3.
GrantD. A.SchipperL. M.The acquisition and extinction of conditioned eyelid responses as a function of the percentage of fixed-ratio random reinforcement. J. exp. Psychol., 1952, 43, 313–320.
4.
GrantD. A.SchipperL. M.RossB. M.Effect of intertrial interval during acquisition on extinction of the conditioned eyelid response following partial reinforcement. J. exp. Psychol., 1952, 44, 203–210.
5.
HumphreysL. G.The effect of random alternation of reinforcement on the acquisition and extinction of conditioned eyelid reactions. J. exp. Psychol., 1939, 25, 294–301.
6.
JenkinsW. O.StanleyJ. C.Partial reinforcement: A review and critique. Psychol. Bull., 1950, 47, 193–234.
7.
LewisD. J.Partial reinforcement: A selective review of the literature since 1950. Psychol. Bull., 1960, 57, 1–28.
8.
LinuquistE. F.Design and analysis of experiments in psychology and education. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1953.
9.
LoganF. A.BeierE. M.EllisR. A.Effect of varied reinforcement on speed of locomotion. J. exp. Psychol., 1955, 49, 260–266.
10.
LoganF. A.BeierE. M.KincaidW. D.Extinction following partial and varied reinforcement. J. exp. Psychol., 1956, 52, 65–70.
11.
PasseyG. E.The influence of intensity of unconditioned stimulus upon acquisition of a conditioned response. J. exp. Psychol., 1948, 38, 420–428.
12.
ReynoldsW. F.Acquisition and extinction of the conditioned eyelid response following partial and continuous reinforcement. J. exp. Psychol., 1958, 55, 335–341.
13.
SheffieldV. F.Extinction as a function of partial reinforcement and distribution of practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1949, 39, 511–526.
14.
SpenceK. W.Learning and performance in eyelid conditioning as a function of the intensity of the UCS. J. exp. Psychol., 1953, 45, 57–63.
15.
SpenceK. W.TaylorJ.Anxiety and strength of the UCS as determiners of the amount of eyelid conditioning. J. exp. Psychol., 1951, 42, 183–188.
