GormezanoI.MooreJ. W.DeauxE.Supplementary report: Effect of UCS intensity on yoked comparisons of classical and instrumental eyelid conditioning. J. exp. Psychol., in press.
2.
GrantD. A.Sensitization and association in eyelid conditioning. J. exp. Psychol., 1943, 32, 201–212.
3.
GuthrieE. R.The psychology of learning. (Rev. ed.) New York: Harper, 1952.
4.
GyntherM. D.Differential eyelid conditioning as a function of stimulus similarity and strength of response. J. exp. Psychol., 1957, 53, 408–416.
5.
HartmanT. A.GrantD. A.Differential eyelid conditioning as a function of the CS-UCS interval. J, exp. Psychol., in press.
6.
HilgardE. R.CampbellA. A.SearsW. R.Conditioned discrimination: The development of discrimination with and without verbal report. Amer. J. Psychol., 1937, 49, 564–580.
7.
HilgardE. R.JonesL. V.KaplanS. J.Conditioned discrimination as related to anxiety. J. exp. Psychol., 1951, 42, 94–99.
8.
MooreJ. W.GormezanoI.Yoked comparisons of instrumental and classical eyelid conditioning. J. exp. Psychol., 1961, 62, 552–559.
9.
SheffieldV. F.Extinction as a function of partial reinforcement and distribution of practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1949, 39, 511–526.
10.
SpenceK. W.BeecroftR. S.Differential conditioning and level of anxiety. J. exp. Psychol., 1954, 48, 399–403.
11.
SpenceK. W.FarberI. E.Relation of anxiety to differential eyelid conditioning. J. exp. Psychol., 1954, 47, 127–134.
12.
RunquistW. N.SpenceK. W.StubbsD. W.Differential conditioning and intensity of the UCS. J. exp. Psychol., 1958, 55, 51–55.
