ChapmanL. J., & BockR. D.Components of variance due to acquiescence and content in the F scale measure of authoritarianism. Psychol. Bull., 1958, 55, 328–333.
4.
ChristieR.HavelJ., & SeidenbergB.Is the F scale irreversible?J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1958, 56, 143–159.
5.
CouchA., & KenistonK.Yeasayers and naysayers: agreeing response set as a personality variable. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1960, 60, 151–174.
6.
GageN. L., & ChatterjeeB. B.The psychological meaning of acquiescence set: further evidence. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1960, 60, 280–282.
7.
GageN. L.LeavittG. S., & StoneG. C.The psychological meaning of acquiescence set for authoritarianism. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1957, 55, 98–103.
8.
JacksonD. N., & MessickS.Content and style in personality assessment. Psychol. Bull., 1958, 55, 243–252.
9.
KaganJ., & MussenP. H.Dependency themes on the TAT and group conformity. J. consult. Psychol., 1956, 20, 29–32.
10.
MessickS., & FredericksenN.Personality and ability correlates of acquiescence response set and “authoritarian” content.Princeton, N.J.: Educ. Testing Service, 1958.
11.
SchaeferE. S., & BellR. Q.Development of the Parental Attitude Research Instrument. Child Develpm., 1958, 29, 339–361.
12.
ZuckermanM.Reversed scales to control acquiescence response set in the Parental Attitude Research Instrument. Child Develpm., 1959, 30, 523–532.
13.
ZuckermanM., & GroszH. J.Suggestibility and dependency. J. consult. Psychol., 1958, 22, 328.
14.
ZuckermanM.LevittE. E., & LubinB.Concurrent and construct validity of direct and indirect tests of dependency. J. consult. Psychol., 1961, 25, 316–323.
15.
ZuckermanM.NortonJ., & SpragueD.Acquiescence and extreme sets and their roles in tests of authoritarianism and parental attitudes. Psychiat. res. Rep., 1958, 10, 28–45.