AmselA.Error responses and reinforcement schedules in self-instructional devices. In LumsdaineA. A. & GlaserR. (Eds.), Teaching machines and programmed-learning.Washington: National Education Association, 1960. Pp. 506–516.
2.
CarrW. J.A functional analysis of self-instructional devices. In LumsdaineA. A. & GlaserR. (Eds.), Teaching machines and programmed learning.Washington: National Education Association, 1960. Pp. 540–562.
3.
GoldbeckR. A.The effect of response mode and learning material difficulty on automated instruction.San Mateo, Calif.: American Institute for Research, 1960. (Tech. Rep. No. 1)
4.
HollandJ. G.Teaching machines: an application of principles from the laboratory. Princeton: Educational Testing Service, 1960. (Proc. Educ. Testing Service Conf.)
5.
IrionA. L., & BriggsL. J.Learning task and mode of operation variables in use of the subject matter trainer.Lowry Air Force Base, Colo.: Air Force Personnel and Training Research Center, October, 1957. (Tech. Rep. AFPTRC-TR-57-8)
6.
LumsdaineA. A.Some issues concerning devices and programs for automated learning. In LumsdaineA. A. & GlaserR. (Eds.), Teaching machines and programmed learning.Washington: National Education Association, 1960. Pp. 517–539.
7.
MonroeW. S. (Ed.) Encyclopedia of educational research.New York: Macmillan, 1960.
8.
MooreJ. W., & SmithW. I.Knowledge of results in self-teaching spelling. Psychol. Rep., 1961, 9, 717–726.
9.
MooreJ. W., & SmithW. I.A comparison of various types of immediate reinforcement as they affect achievement in a verbal task. In SmithW. I. & MooreJ. W. (Eds.), Programmed learning: theory and research.Princeton: Van Nostrand, 1962. Pp. 177–186.
10.
PorterD.An application of reinforcement principles to classroom teaching: the teaching of phonemically and orthographically analyzed spelling materials by an automatic teaching device.Cambridge: Harvard Univer. Laboratory for Research in Instruction, 1961.
11.
SkinnerB. F.The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard educ. Rev., 1954, 24, 86–97.
