CrowderN. A.Automatic tutoring by means of intrinsic programming. In GalanterE. (Ed.), Automatic teaching: the state of the art.New York: Wiley, 1959. Pp. 109–116.
2.
EwertJ. F., & LambertP. H.The effect of verbal instructions upon the formation of a concept. J. gen. Psychol., 1932, 6, 400–411.
3.
GagneR. M.Implications of some doctrines of mathematics teaching for research in human learning. In Research problems in mathematics education, OE 12008. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1960. Pp. 49–56.
4.
GagneR. M., & BollesR. C.A review of factors in learning efficiency. In GalanterE. (Ed.), Automatic teaching: the state of the art.New York: Wiley, 1959. Pp. 13–54.
5.
HaslerudG. M., & MeyersS.The transfer value of given and individually derived principles. J. educ. Psychol., 1958, 49, 293–298.
6.
HendrixG.Non-verbal awareness in the learning of mathematics. In Research problems in mathematics education, OE 12008. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1960. Pp. 57–61.
7.
KatonaG.Organizing and memorizing.New York: Columbia Univer. Press, 1940.
8.
KendlerH. H.Teaching machines and psychological theory. In GalanterE. (Ed.), Automatic teaching: the state of the art.New York: Wiley, 1959. Pp. 177–185.
9.
KurtzK. H., & HovlandC. I.The effect of verbalization during observation of stimulus objects upon accuracy of recognition and recall. J. exp. Psychol., 1953, 45, 157–164.
10.
LumsdaineA. A., & GlaserR.Teaching machines and programmed learning.Washington, D. C.: National Education Assn, 1960.
11.
SkinnerB. F.The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard educ. Rev., 1954, 24, 86–97.
