BarryH.III. Effects of strength of drive on learning and on extinction. J. exp. Psychol., 1958, 55, 473–481.
2.
CampbellB. A., & KraelingD.Response strength as a function of drive level during training and extinction. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1954, 47, 101–103.
3.
EismanE.An investigation of the parameters defining drive (D). J. exp. Psychol., 1956, 52, 85–89.
4.
EismanE.AsimowA., & MaltzmanI.Habit strength as a function of drive in a brightness discrimination problem. J. exp. Psychol., 1956, 52, 58–64.
5.
EismanE.LintonM., & TheiosJ.The relationship between response strength and one parameter of the hunger drive. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1960, 53, 359–363.
6.
FinanJ. L.Quantitative studies in motivation: I. Strength of conditioning in rats under varying degrees of hunger. J. comp. Psychol., 1940, 29, 119–134.
7.
KendlerH. H.Drive interaction: II. Experimental analysis of the role of drive in learning theory. J. exp. Psychol., 1945, 35, 188–198.
8.
KimbleG. A.Hilgard and Marquis' Conditioning and Learning.New York: Appleton-Century Crofts, 1961.
LewisD. J., & CottonJ. W.Learning and performance as a function of drive strength during acquisition and extinction. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1957, 50, 189–194.
11.
SiegelS.Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.
12.
SnedecorG. W.Statistical methods. (5th ed.) Ames: Iowa State College Press, 1956.
13.
SpenceK. W.Learning and performance in eyelid conditioning as a function of intensity of the UCS. J. exp. Psychol., 1953, 45, 57–63.
14.
StrassburgerR. C.Resistance to extinction of a conditioned operant as related to drive level at reinforcement. J. exp. Psychol., 1950, 40, 473–487.
