AmselA.The role of frustrative nonreward in noncontinuous reward situations. Psychol. Bull., 1958, 55, 102–109.
2.
CapaldiE. J.Spontaneous recovery following nonresponse extinction. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1958, 51, 644–646.
3.
DeutchJ. A.The inadequacy of the Hullian derivations of reasoning and latent learning. Psychol Rev., 1956, 63, 389–399.
4.
DyalJ. A.Latent extinction as a function of number and duration of pre-extinction exposures. J. exp. Psychol., 1961, in press.
5.
GlanzerM.Stimulus satiation: an explanation of spontaneous alternation and related phenomena. Psychol. Rev., 1953, 60, 257–268.
6.
KendlerH. H., & LevineS.A more sensitive test of irrelevant-incentive learning under conditions of satiation. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1953, 46, 271–273.
7.
MoltzH.Latent extinction and the fractional anticipatory response mechanism. Psychol. Rev., 1957, 64, 229–241.
8.
MoltzH., & MaddiS. R.Reduction of secondary reward value as a function of drive strength during latent extinction. J. exp. Psychol., 1956, 52, 71–76.
9.
PliskoffS. S.Response elimination as a function of generalization, motivation and number of non-response extinction trials. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York Univer., 1955.
10.
RitchieB. F.Explanatory powers of the fractional antedating response mechanism. Brit. J. Psychol., 1959, 50, 1–15.
11.
RitchieB. F., & OwenR.The effect of change of incentive on reaction potential. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1959, 52, 594–597.
12.
SpenceK. W.Theoretical interpretations of learning. In StoneC. P. (Ed.), Comparative psychology.New York: Prentice-Hall, 1951.
13.
ThompsonM. E.A two-factor theory of inhibition. Psychol Rev.1960, 67, 200–206.