AttneaveF., & ChamblissD. J.An improved method for deriving equal discriminability scales from ratings. Psychol. Bull., 1957, 54, 253–255.
2.
BershP. J.NottermanJ. M., & SchoenfeldW. N.Generalization to varying tone frequencies as a function of intensity of unconditioned stimulus. USAF Sch. Aviat. Med. Rep., 1956, No. 56-79.
3.
BlackwellH. R.Comments on “subliminal projection.”J. Communic., 1958, 8, 68–76.
4.
BrunerJ. S., & PostmanL.Tension and tension release as organizing factors in perception. J. Pers., 1947, 15, 300–308.
5.
EriksenC. W., & WechslerH.Some effects of experimentally induced anxiety upon discrimination behavior. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1955, 51, 458–463.
6.
FillenbaumS.The effect of distributional skewing upon judgment with free choice of scale. Amer. J. Psychol., 1960, 73, 132–136.
7.
GarnerW. R., & HakeH. W.The amount of information in absolute judgments. Psychol. Rev., 1951, 58, 446–459.
8.
GrantD. A., & SchillerJ. J.Generalization of the conditioned galvanic skin response to visual stimuli. J. exp. Psychol., 1953, 46, 309–313
9.
HelsonH.Adaptation-level as a basis for a quantitative theory of frames of reference. Psychol. Rev., 1948, 55, 297–313.
10.
ParducciA.Direction of shift in the judgment of single stimuli. J. exp. Psychol., 1956, 51, 169–178.
11.
RosenbaumG.Stimulus generalization as a function of level of experimentally induced anxiety. J. exp. Psychol., 1953, 45, 35–43.
