AttneaveF., & ChamblissD. J.An improved method for deriving equal discriminability scales from ratings. Psychol. Bull., 1957, 54, 253–255.
3.
EriksenC. W., & HakeH. W.Anchor effects in absolute judgments. J. exp. Psychol., 1957, 53, 132–138.
4.
FehrerE.Shifts in scale values of attitude statements as a function of the composition of the scale. J. exp. Psychol., 1952, 44, 179–188.
5.
HeintzR. K.The effect of remote anchoring points upon the judgment of lifted weights. J. exp. Psychol., 1950, 40, 584–591.
6.
HelsonH.Adaptation-level as a basis for a quantitative theory of frames of reference. Psychol. Rev., 1948, 55, 297–313.
7.
HovlandC. I.SherifM.Judgmental phenomena and scales of attitude measurement: item displacement in Thurstone scales. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1952, 47, 822–832.
8.
McGarveyH. R.Anchoring effects in the absolute judgment of verbal materials. Arch. Psychol., 1943, 39, No. 281.
SherifM., & HovlandC. I.Judgmental phenomena and scales of attitude measurement: placement of items with individual choice of number of categories. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1953, 48, 135–141.
11.
SherifM.TaubD., & HovlandC. I.Assimilation and contrast effects of anchoring stimuli on judgments. J. exp. Psychol., 1958, 55, 150–155.
12.
ThurstoneL. L., & ChaveE. J.The measurement of attitude.Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1929.
13.
WebsterH.SanfordN., & FreedmanM.A new instrument for studying authoritarianism in personality. J. Psychol., 1955, 40, 73–84.
14.
WeissW.The effects on opinions of a change in scale judgments. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1959, 58, 329–334.