CowenE. L.Stress reduction and problem solving rigidity. J. consult. Psychol., 1952, 16, 425–428.
2.
CowenE. L.The experimental analogue: an approach to psychotherapy research. Psychol. Rep., 1961, 8, 9–10.
3.
DinoffM.RickardH. C.SalzbergN., & SipprelleC. N.An experimental analogue of three psychotherapeutic approaches. J. clin. Psychol., 1960, 17, 70–73.
4.
DittesJ. E.Extinction during psychotherapy of GSR accompanying “embarrassing” statements. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1957, 54, 187–191. (a)
5.
DittesJ. E.Galvanic skin response as a measure of patient's reaction to therapist's permissiveness. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1957, 55, 295–303. (b)
6.
DivenK.Certain determinants of the conditioning of anxiety reactions. J. Psychol., 1937, 3, 291–308.
7.
GordonJ. E.Leading and following psychotherapeutic techniques with hypnotically induced repression and hostility. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1957, 54, 405–410.
8.
GordonJ. E.MartinB., & LundyR. M.GSRs during repression, suppression and verbalization in psychotherapeutic interviews. J. consult. Psychol., 1959, 23, 243–251.
9.
GrossmanD.An experimental investigation of a psychotherapeutic technique. J. consult. Psychol., 1952, 16, 325–331.
10.
HaggardE. A.Some conditions, determining adjustment during and readjustment following experimentally induced stress. In TompkinsS. D. (Ed.), Contemporary psychopathology.Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univer. Press, 1947. Pp. 529–544.
11.
HaggardE. A., & GerbrandsR.An apparatus for the measurement of continuous changes in palmar skin resistance. J. exp. Psychol., 1947, 37, 92–98.
12.
KeetC. D.Two verbal techniques in a miniature counseling situation. Psychol. Monogr., 1948, 62, No. 7 (Whole No. 294).
13.
KesnerL. S.A comparison of the effectiveness of two psychotherapy techniques in the resolution of a posthypnotic conflict. J. clin. exp. Hypnosis, 1954, 2, 55–75.
14.
LaceyJ. I.Psychophysiological approaches to the evaluation of psychotherapeutic process and outcome. In RubensteinE. A. and ParloffM. B. (Eds.), Research in psychotherapy.Washington, D. C.: Amer. Psychol. Assn, 1959. Pp. 160–208.
15.
MartinB.Galvanic skin conductance as a function of successive interviews. J. clin. Psychol., 1956, 12, 91–94.
16.
MartinB.LundyR. M., & LewinM. H.Verbal and GSR responses in experimental interviews as a function of three degrees of “therapist” communication. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1960, 60, 234–240.
17.
MehlmanB.Group play therapy with mentally retarded children. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1953, 48, 53–60.
18.
ObristP. A.An investigation of the claim of autonomic discrimination without awareness and the relationship of GSR conditioning to measures of skin conductance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univer. of Rochester, 1958.
19.
O'KelleyL. I.Physiological changes during psychotherapy. In MowrerO. H. (Ed.), Psychotherapy: theory and research.New York: Ronald, 1953. Pp. 641–656.
20.
PomeroyD. S.The ameliorative effects of “counseling” upon maze performance following experimentally induced stress. Amer. Psychologist, 1950, 5, 327. (Abstract)
21.
ThetfordW. N.An objective measurement of frustration tolerance in evaluating psychotherapy. In WolffW. and PreckerJ. A. (Eds.), Success in psychotherapy.New York: Grune & Stratton, 1952. Pp. 26–62.
22.
WienerM.The effects of two experimental counseling techniques on performances impaired by induced stress. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1955, 51, 565–572.