ArmusH. L.Effect of magnitude of reinforcement on acquisition and extinction of a running response. J. exp. Psychol., 1959, 58, 61–63.
2.
ButterC. M., & CampbellB. A.Running speed as a function of successive reversals in hunger drive level. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1960, 53, 52–54.
3.
CampbellB. A., & KraelingD.Response strength as a function of drive level during training and extinction. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1954, 47, 101–103.
4.
DeeseJ., & CarpenterJ. A.Drive level and reinforcement. J. exp. Psychol., 1951, 42, 236–238.
5.
DavisR. H.The effect of drive reversal on latency, amplitude, and activity level. J. exp. Psychol., 1957, 53, 310–315.
6.
LindquistE. F.Design and analysis of experiments in psychology and education.Cambridge, Mass.: Houghton Mifflin, 1953.
7.
ReynoldsW. F.RichterM. L., & CarlockJ.Resistance to extinction as a function of reward magnitude and number of training trials. Paper read at Psychonomic Society meetings, Chicago, September, 1960.
