GreenspoonJ.The reinforcing effect of two spoken sounds on the frequency of two responses. Amer. J. Psychol., 1955, 68, 409–416.
4.
HullC. L.Special review of Thorndike, The Fundamentals of Learning. Psychol. Bull., 1935, 32, 807–823.
5.
HullC. L.Reactively heterogeneous compound trial-and-error learning with distributed trials and terminal reinforcement. J. exp. Psychol., 1947, 37, 118–135.
6.
HullC. L.Reactively heterogeneous compound trial-and-error learning with distributed trials and serial reinforcement. J. exp. Psychol., 1948, 38, 17–28.
7.
JenkinsW. O.CunninghamL. M.The guessing-sequence hypothesis, the “spread of effect,” and number guessing habits. J. exp. Psychol., 1949, 39, 158–168.
8.
JenkinsW. O.SheffieldF. D.Rehearsal and guessing habits as sources of the “spread of effect.”J. exp. Psychol., 1946, 36, 316–330.
9.
KoppenaalR. J.KennyD. T.Postremity in human maze learning. Canad. J. Psychol., 1960, 14, 121–130.
10.
LorgeI.The effect of the initial chances for right responses upon the efficacy of intensified reward and of intensified punishment. J. exp. Psychol., 1933, 16, 362–373. (a).
11.
LorgeI.The efficacy of intensified reward and of intensified punishment. J. exp. Psychol., 1933, 16, 177–207. (b).
12.
LorgeI.EisensonJ.EpsteinB.Further experiments in the strength of connections where the connection is punished or rewarded or neither punished nor rewarded. J. exp. Psychol., 1934, 17, 412–423.
13.
LorgeI.ThorndikeE. L.The comparative strengthening of a connection by one or more occurrences of it in cases where the connection was punished and was neither punished nor rewarded. J. exp. Psychol., 1933, 16, 374–382.
14.
MarxM. H.An experimental study of response repetition and success gradients in multiple-choice learning. Unpublished master's thesis, Washington Univer., 1941.
15.
MarxM. H.Spread of effect: A critical review. Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 1956, 53, 119–186.
16.
McGeochJ. A.IrionA. L.The psychology of human learning. New York: Longmans, Green, 1952.
17.
NuttinJ.“Spread” in recalling failure and success. J. exp. Psychol., 1949, 39, 690–699.
18.
PetersonJ.Learning when frequency and recency factors are negative. J. exp. Psychol., 1922, 5, 270–300.
19.
PorterL. W.The effect of “right” in a modified Thorndikian situation. Amer. J. Psychol., 1957, 70, 219–226.
20.
PostmanL.AdamsP. A.Performance variables in the experimental analysis of the law of effect. Amer. J. Psychol., 1954, 67, 612–631.
21.
ShellyM. W.The effects of response contingent probabilities which favor response change. J. exp. Psychol., 1958, 56, 239–245.
22.
SpenceK. W.Behavior theory and conditioning. New Haven: Yale Univer. Press, 1956.
23.
StephensJ. M.Further notes on punishment and reward. J. genet. Psychol., 1934, 44, 464–472. (a).
24.
StephensJ. M.The influence of punishment on learning. J. exp. Psychol., 1934, 17, 536–555. (b).
25.
StephensJ. M.The influence of symbolic punishment and reward upon strong and weak associations. J. gen. Psychol., 1941, 25, 177–185.
26.
StephensJ. M.BaerJ. A.The influence of punishment on learning when the opportunity for inner repetition is reduced. J. genet. Psychol., 1937, 51, 209–217.
27.
StoneG. R.The effect of negative incentive in serial learning: III. Fixation due to an isolated verbal punishment. J. gen. Psychol., 1948, 38, 207–216.
28.
StoneG. R.The effect of negative incentives in serial learning: II. Incentive intensity and response variability. J. gen. Psychol., 1950, 42, 179–224.
29.
StoneG. R.The effect of negative incentives in serial learning: V. Response repetition as a function of successive serial verbal punishments. J. exp. Psychol., 1951, 42, 20–24.
30.
StoneG. R.The effect of negative incentives in serial learning: VII. Theory of punishment. J. gen. Psychol., 1953, 48, 133–161.
31.
StoneG. R.WaltersN.The effect of negative incentives in serial learning: VI. Response repetition as a function of an isolated electric shock punishment. J. exp. Psychol., 1951, 41, 411–418.
32.
ThorndikeE. L.Fundamentals of learning. New York: Teach. Coll., Columbia Univer., 1932.
33.
ThorndikeE. L.An experimental study of rewards. (Teach. Coll., Columbia Univer., Contr. Educ., No. 580)New York: Bureau of Publications, Teach. Coll., Columbia Univer., 1933. (a).
34.
ThorndikeE. L.A proof of the law of effect. Science, 1933, 77, 173–175. (b).
35.
TiltonJ. W.The effect of “right” and “wrong” upon the learning of nonsense syllables in multiple choice arrangement. J. educ. Psychol., 1939, 30, 95–115.
36.
TiltonJ. W.Gradients of effect. J. genet. Psychol., 1945, 66, 3–19.
37.
TuckmanJ.The influence of varying amounts of punishment on mental connections. (Teach. Coll., Columbia Univer., Contr. Educ., No. 590)New York: Bureau of Publications, Teach. Coll., Columbia Univer., 1933.
38.
VoeksV. W.Postremity, recency, and frequency as bases for prediction in the maze situation. J. exp. Psychol., 1948, 38, 495–510.
39.
WaitsJ. V.The law of effect in the retained situation. Arch. Psychol., N. Y., 1937, 30, No. 208.
40.
WallachH.HenleM.An experimental analysis of the law of effect. J. exp. Psychol., 1941, 28, 340–349.
41.
WallachH.HenleM.A further study of the function of reward. J. exp. Psychol., 1942, 30, 147–160.
42.
ZirkleG. A.Success and failure in serial learning. I. The Thorndike effect. J. exp. Psychol., 1946, 36, 230–236.