Alternation in a T Maze as a Function of Three Variables

Abstract

View all access options for this article.

Dember

W. N.

Fowler

Spontaneous alternation behavior. Psychol. Bull., 1958, 55, 412–428.

Edwards

A. L.

Experimental design in psychological research. New York: Rinehart, 1960.

Glanzer

Stimulus satiation: An explanation of spontaneous alternation and related phenomena. Psychol. Rev., 1953, 60, 257–268.

Grosslight

J. H.

Ticknor

Variability and reactive inhibition in the meal worm as a function of determined turning sequences. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1953, 46, 35–38.

Hull

C. L.

Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century, 1943.

Hull

C. L.

A behavior system. New Haven: Yale Univer. Press, 1952.

Hunter

W. S.

The temporal maze and kinaesthetic sensory processes in the white rat. Psychobiol., 1920, 2, 1–17.

McNemar

On Wilson's distribution-free test of analysis of variance hypotheses. Psychol. Bull., 1957, 54, 361–362.

Solomon

R. L.

The influence of work on behavior. Psychol. Bull., 1948, 45, 1–40.

10.

Thompson

M. E.

Reactive inhibition as a factor in maze learning: III. Effects in the human stylus maze. J. exp. Psychol., 1952, 43, 130–133.

11.

Thompson

M. E.

A two-factor theory of inhibition. Psychol. Rev., 1960, 67, 200–206.