Additive versus Multiplicative Combination of Drive and Incentive

Brown J. The effect of drive on learning with secondary reinforcement. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1956, 49, 254–260.

Bugelski B. R. The psychology of learning. New York: Holt, 1956.

Campbell B. A. , & Kraeling D. Response strength as a function of drive level and amount of drive reduction. J. exp. Psychol., 1953, 45, 97–101.

Crespi L. P. Quantitative variation of incentive and performance in the white rat. Amer. J. Psychol., 1942, 55, 467–517.

Deese J. , & Carpenter J. A. Drive level and reinforcement. J. exp. Psychol., 1951, 42, 236–238.

Dufort R. H. , & Kimble G. A. Changes in response strength with changes in the amount of reinforcement. J. exp. Psychol., 1956, 51, 185–191.

Eisman F. Asimow A. , & Maltzman I. Habit strength as a function of drive in a brightness discrimination problem. J. exp. Psychol., 1956, 52, 58–64.

Finan J. L. Quantitative studies in motivation: I. Strength of conditioning in rats under varying degrees of hunger J. comp. Psychol., 1940, 29, 119–134.

Fletcher F. M. Effects of quantitative variation of food incentive on the performance of physical work by chimpanzees. Comp. Psychol. Monogr., 1940, 16, No. 82.

Grindley G. C. Experiments on the influence of amount of reward on learning in young chickens. Brit. J. Psychol., 1929, 20, 173–180.

Heyman W. Certain relationships between stimulus intensity and stimulus generalization. J. exp. Psychol., 1957, 53, 239–248.

Hillman B. Hunter W. , & Kimble G. The effect of drive level on the maze performance of the white rat. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1953, 46, 87–89.

Hulicka I. Combination of drive and incentive. Quart. J. exp. Psychol., 1959, in press.

Hull C. L. Essentials of behavior. New Haven: Yale Univer. Press, 1951.

Hull C. L. A behavior system. New Haven: Yale Univer. Press, 1952.

Kendler H. H. Drive interaction: II. Experimental analysis of the role of drive in learning theory. J. exp. Psychol., 1945, 35, 188–198.

Loess H. B. The effect of variations of motivational level and changes in motivational level on performance in learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State Univer. of Iowa, 1952.

Mackintosh I. Hullian predictions for irregular learning conditions. J. gen. Psychol., 1957, 56, 233–241.

Passey G. E. The influence of intensity of unconditional stimulus upon acquisition of a conditional response. J. exp. Psychol., 1948, 38, 420–428.

Perin C. T. Behavior potentiality as a joint function of the amount of training and degree of hunger at the time of extinction. J. exp. Psychol., 1943, 32, 37–51.

Ramond C. K. Performance in selective learning as a function of hunger J. exp. Psychol., 1954, 48, 265–270.

Reynolds B. The relationship between the strength of a habit and the degree of drive present during acquisition. J. exp. Psychol., 1949, 39, 296–305.

Reynolds B. Marx M. , & Henderson R. Resistance to extinction as a function of drive-reward interaction. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1952, 45, 36–42.

Spence K. W. Current interpretations of learning data and some recent developments in stimulus response theory. In Learning theory, personality theory and clinical research. New York: Wiley, 1954.

Spence K. W. Behavior theory and conditioning. New Haven: Yale Univer. Press, 1956.

Strassburger R. C. Resistance to extinction of a conditioned operant as related to drive level at reinforcement. J. exp. Psychol., 1950, 40, 473–487.

Tell K. S. Habit strength as a function of motivation during learning. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1952, 45, 189–191.

Williams S. B. Resistance to extinction as a function of the number of reinforcements. J. exp. Psychol., 1938, 23, 506–522.