Ability,Acquiescence,and “Authoritarianism”

Adorno T. W. Frenkel-Brunswik E. Levinson D. J. Sanford R. N. The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper, 1950.

Ancona L. Indagine sulla natura psichica del “Response Set.” La “motivazione al successo.” Arch. psicol. neurol. Psichiat., 1954, 15, 23–74.

Bass B. M. Authoritarianism or acquiescence? J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1955, 51, 611–623.

Chapman L. J. Campbell D. T. Response set in the F scale. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1957, 54, 129–132.

Christie R. Authoritarianism re-examined. In Christie R. Jahoda M. (Eds.), Studies in the scope and method of ‘The Authoritarian Personality.’ Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1954.

Christie R. Havel J. Seidenberg B. Is the F scale irreversible? J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1958, 56, 143–159.

Cronbach L. J. Studies of acquiescence as a factor in the true-false test. J. educ. Psychol., 1942, 33, 401–415.

Cronbach L. J. Response sets and test validity. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1946, 6, 475–494.

Frederiksen N. Messick S. Response set as a measure of personality. Educ. psychol. Measmt., in press.

French J. W. The description of aptitude and achievement tests in terms of rotated factors. Psychometric Monogr. No. 5, 1951.

French J. W. , (Ed.) Kit of selected tests for reference aptitude and achievement factors. Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service, 1954.

Frenkel-Brunswik E. Intolerance of ambiguity as an emotional and perceptual variable. J. Pers., 1949, 18, 108–143.

Gage N. L. Leavitt G. S. Stone G. C. The psychological meaning of acquiescence set for authoritarianism. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1957, 55, 98–103.

Green B. F. Attitude measurement. In Lindzey G. (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology. Vol. I. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley, 1954.

Helmstadter G. C. Procedures for obtaining separate set and content components of a test score. Psychometrika, 1957, 22, 381–393.

Jackson D. N. Messick S. A note on ethnocentrism and acquiescent response sets. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1957, 54, 132–134.

Jackson D. N. Messick S. Content and style in personality assessment. Psychol. Bull., 1958, 55, 243–252.

Jackson D. N. Messick S. Solley C. M. How “rigid” is the “authoritarian”? J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1957, 54, 137–140.

Leavitt H. J. Hax H. Roche J. H. “Authoritarianism” and agreement with things authoritative. J. Psychol., 1955, 40, 215–221.

Messick S. The perception of social attitudes. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1956, 52, 57–66.

Messick S. Jackson D. N. Authoritarianism or acquiescence in Bass's data. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1957, 54, 424–426.

Messick S. Jackson D. N. The measurement of authoritarian attitudes. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1958, 18, 241–253.

O'Neil W. M. Levinson D. J. A factorial exploration of authoritarianism and some of its ideological concomitants. J. Pers., 1954, 22, 449–463.

Rundquist E. A. Form of statement in personality measurement. J. educ. Psychol., 1940, 31, 135–147.

Saunders D. R. Some preliminary interpretive material for the PRI. Research Memorandum 55-15. Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service, 1955.

Shelley H. P. Response set and the California attitude scales. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1956, 16, 63–67.

Witkin H. A. Lewis H. B. Hertzman M. Machover K. Meissner P. B. Wapner S. Personality through perception. New York: Harper, 1954.