DayH. P.A study of the validity of the MTAI as a predictive instrument in the selection of good teaching prospects from among college undergraduates. Dissertation Abstr., 1956, 16, 500–501.
5.
DownieN. M.BellC. R.The MTAI as an aid in the selection of teachers. J. educ. Res., 1953, 46, 699–704.
6.
EdwardsA.Experimental design in psychological research. New York: Rinehart, 1950.
7.
KearneyN.RocchioP. D.The relation between the MTAI and subject matter taught by elementary teachers. Educ. Adm. Superv., 1955, 41, 358–360.
8.
KearneyN.RocchioP. D.Using the MTAI in counseling prospective teachers. Personn. guid. J., 1955, 34, 159–160.
9.
KearneyN.RocchioP. D.The effect of teacher education on the teacher's attitude. J. educ. Res., 1956, 49, 703–708.
10.
LeedsC. H.Teacher attitudes and temperament as a measure of teacher-pupil rapport. J. appl. Psychol., 1956, 40, 333–337.
11.
MichaelisJ. U.The prediction of success in student teaching from personality and attitude inventories. Univer. Calif. Publ. Educ., 1954, 11 (6), 415–484.
12.
RocchioP. D.KearneyN.Using an attitude inventory in selecting teachers. Elem. Sch. J., 1955, 56, 76–78.
13.
RogersV. R.SmithJ. A.Professional attitudes of students in an intensive teacher-training program. Elem. Sch. J., 1956, 57, 100–101.