CampbellB. A.The fractional reduction in noxious stimulation required to produce “just noticeable” learning. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1955, 48, 141–148.
2.
CampbellB. A.KraelingD.Response strength as a function of drive level and amount of drive reduction. J. exp. Psychol., 1953, 45, 97–101.
3.
DinsmoorJ. A.HughesL. H.Training rats to press a bar to turn off shock. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1956, 49, 235–238.
4.
HarrisonJ. M.TracyW. H.The use of auditory stimuli to maintain lever pressing behavior. Science, 1955, 121, 373–374.
5.
KaplanM.The effect of noxious stimulus intensity and duration during intermittent reinforcement of escape behavior. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1952, 54, 538–549.
6.
KaplanM.The maintenance of escape behavior under fixed-ratio reinforcement. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1956, 49, 153–157.
7.
KellerF. S.Light-aversion in the white rat. Psychol. Rec., 1941, 4, 235–250.
8.
SkinnerB. F.CampbellS. L.An automatic shocking-grid apparatus for continuous use. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1947, 40, 305–307.
9.
ZeamanD.HouseB.Response latency at zero drive after varying numbers of reinforcements. J. exp. Psychol., 1950, 40, 570–583.
