AdkinsD. C.The effects of practice on intelligence test scores. J. educ. Psychol., 1937, 28, 222–231.
2.
AdornoT. W.Frenkel-BrunswikE.LevinsonD. J.SanfordR. N.The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper, 1950.
3.
AndersonT. W.On estimation of parameters in latent structure analysis. Psychometrika, 1954, 19, 1–10.
4.
BayleyN.On the growth of intelligence. Amer. Psychologist, 1955, 10, 805–818.
5.
BrogdenH. E.Variation in test validity with variation in the distribution of item difficulties, number of items, and degree of their intercorrelation. Psychometrika, 1946, 11, 197–214.
6.
BrogdenH. E.A rationale for minimizing distortion in personality questionnaire keys. Psychometrika, 1954, 19, 141–148.
7.
BrunswikE.Systematic and representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley: Univer. of Calif. Press, 1947.
8.
BrunswikE.Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychol. Rev., 1955, 62, 193–217.
9.
CampbellD. T.The indirect assessment of social attitudes. Psychol. Bull., 1950, 47, 15–38.
10.
CarrollJ. B.Criteria for the evaluation of achievement tests. In Proceedings, 1950 Invitational Conference on Testing Problems. Princeton: Educ. Testing Service, 1951. Pp. 95–99.
11.
CattellR. B.Description and measurement of personality. Yonkers-on-Hudson: World Book, 1946.
12.
ChiangC. L.On the design of mass medical surveys. Human Biol., 1951, 23, 242–271.
13.
CoombsC. H.A theory of psychological scaling. Ann Arbor: Engineering Res. Inst., Univer. of Michigan, 1952.
14.
CoombsC. H.Theory and methods of social measurement. In FestingerL.KatzD. (Eds.), Research methods in the behavioral sciences. New York: Dryden, 1953. Pp. 471–535.
15.
CoombsC. H.KaoR. C.Nonmetric factor analysis. Ann Arbor: Engineering Res. Inst., Univer. of Michigan, 1955.
16.
CronbachL. J.Statistical methods applied to Rorschach scores: A review. Psychol. Bull., 1949, 46, 393–429.
17.
CronbachL. J.Further evidence on response sets and test design. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1950, 10, 3–31.
18.
CronbachL. J.Report on a psychometric mission to Clinicia. Psychometrika, 1954, 19, 263–270.
CronbachL. J.WarringtonW. G.Efficiency of multiple-choice tests as a function of spread of item difficulties. Psychometrika, 1952, 17, 127–147.
22.
DorrisR. J.LevinsonD. J.HanfmannE.Authoritarian personality studied by a new variation of the sentence completion technique. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1954, 49, 99–108.
23.
DuboisP. H.LoevingerJ.GleserG. C.The construction of homogeneous keys for a biographical inventory. Res. Bull 52-18, Air Training Command, Human Resources Research Center, 1952, Lackland Air Force Base.
24.
DuMasF. M.Manifest structure analysis. Missoula: Montana State Univer. Press, 1955.
25.
DuMasF. M.FrostC. H.RashleighC. H.A manifest structure analysis of information files. J. clin. Psychol., 1956, 12, 139–143.
26.
EdwardsA. C. H. Coombs, A theory of psychological scaling. Psychometrika, 1954, 19, 89–91. (Review)
27.
EliasG.Self-evaluative questionnaires as projective measures of personality. J. consult. Psychol., 1951, 15, 496–500.
28.
EysenckH. J.Criterion analysis—an application of the hypothetico-deductive method to factor analysis. Psychol. Rev., 1950, 57, 38–53.
29.
EysenckH. J.The scientific study of personality. London: Routledge & K. Paul, 1952.
GuttmanL.A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability. Psychometrika, 1945, 10, 255–282.
46.
GuttmanL.The Cornell technique for scale and intensity analysis. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1947, 7, 247–280.
47.
GuttmanL.The problem of attitude and opinion measurement. In StoufferS. A., Measurement and prediction. Princeton: Princeton Univer. Press, 1950. Pp. 46–59.
48.
GuttmanL.Image theory for the structure of quantitative variates. Psychometrika, 1953, 18, 277–296.
49.
GuttmanL.The Israel Alpha technique for scale analysis. In RileyM. W., Sociological studies in scale analysis. New Brunswick: Rutgers Univer. Press, 1954. Pp. 410–415.
50.
GuttmanL.A new approach to factor analysis: The radex. In LazarsfeldP. F. (Ed.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1954. Pp. 258–348.
51.
GuttmanL.A generalized simplex for factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1955, 20, 173–192.
52.
HaggardE. A.Intraclass correlation and the analysis of variance. New York: Dryden, in press.
53.
Harrower-EricksonM. R.The value and limitations of the so-called “neurotic signs.”Rorschach Res. Exch., 1942, 6, 109–114.
54.
HathawayS. R.McKinleyJ. D.A multiphasic personality schedule: I. Construction of the schedule. J. Psychol., 1940, 10, 249–254.
55.
HaysD. G.BorgattaE. F.An empirical comparison of restricted and general latent distance analysis. Psychometrika, 1954, 19, 271–279.
56.
HorstP.Pattern analysis and configural scoring. J. clin. Psychol., 1954, 10, 3–11.
57.
HovlandC. I.SherifM.Judgmental phenomena and scales of attitude measurement: Item displacement in Thurstone scales. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1952, 47, 822–832.
58.
HumphreysL. G.Individual differences. In StoneC. P.TaylorD. W. (Eds.), Annual review of psychology. Stanford: Annual Reviews, 1952. Pp. 131–150.
59.
HuntH. F.Testing for psychological deficit. In BrowerD.AbtL. E. (Eds.), Progress in clinical psychology. Vol. 1, Sec. 1. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1952. Pp. 91–107.
60.
JessorR.HammondK. R.Construct validity and the Taylor anxiety scale. Psychol. Bull., 1957, 54, 161–170.
KellyE. L.MilesC. C.TermanL. M.Ability to influence one's score on a typical pencil-and-paper test of personality. Charact. & Pers., 1936, 4, 206–215.
63.
LafitteJ.Spearman's form of criterion analysis. Brit. J. stat. Psychol., 1954, 7, 57–60.
64.
LazarsfeldP. F.The interpretation and computation of some latent structures. In StoufferS. A., Measurement and prediction. Princeton: Princeton Univer. Press, 1950. Pp. 413–472.
65.
LazarsfeldP. F.The logical and mathematical foundation of latent structure analysis. In StoufferS. A., Measurement and prediction. Princeton: Princeton Univer. Press, 1950. Pp. 362–412.
66.
LazarsfeldP. F.A conceptual introduction to latent structure analysis. In LazarsfeldP. F. (Ed.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1954. Pp. 349–387.
67.
LennonR. T.Assumptions underlying the use of content validity. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1956, 16, 294–304.
68.
LindzeyG.Thematic Apperception Test: Interpretive assumptions and related empirical evidence. Psychol. Bull., 1952, 49, 1–25.
69.
LoevingerJ.A systematic approach to the construction and evaluation of tests of ability. Psychol. Monogr., 1947, 61, No. 4 (Whole No. 285).
70.
LoevingerJ.The technic of homogeneous tests compared with some aspects of “scale analysis” and factor analysis. Psychol. Bull., 1948, 45, 507–529.
71.
LoevingerJ.The attenuation paradox in test theory. Psychol. Bull., 1954, 51, 493–504.
72.
LoevingerJ.Effect of distortions of measurement on item selection. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1954, 3, 441–448.
MaccorquodaleK.MeehlP. E.On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psychol. Rev., 1948, 55, 95–107.
82.
MarschakJ.Probability in the social sciences. In LazarsfeldP. F. (Ed.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1954. Pp. 166–215.
83.
McQuittyL. L.A statistical method for studying personality integration. In MowrerO. H. (Ed.), Psychotherapy: Theory and research. New York: Ronald, 1953. Pp. 414–462.
84.
McQuittyL. L.Theories and methods in some objective assessments of psychological well-being. Psychol Monogr., 1954, 68, No. 14 (Whole No. 385).
85.
MeehlP. E.The dynamics of “structured” personality tests. J. clin. Psychol., 1945, 1, 296–303.
86.
MeehlP. E.Configural scoring. J. consult. Psychol., 1950, 14, 165–171.
87.
MeehlP. E.Clinical vs. statistical prediction. Minneapolis: Univer. of Minnesota Press, 1954.
88.
MeehlP. E.Wanted—a good cookbook. Amer. Psychologist, 1956, 11, 263–272.
89.
MeehlP. E.RosenA.Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores. Psychol. Bull., 1955, 52, 194–216.
90.
MowrerO. H.“Q technique”—description, history, and critique. In MowrerO. H. (Ed.), Psychotherapy: Theory and research. New York: Ronald, 1953. Pp. 316–375.
91.
OwensW. A.Item form and “false-positive” response on a neurotic inventory. J. clin. Psychol., 1947, 3, 264–269.
92.
PeakH.Problems of objective observation. In FestingerL.KatzD. (Eds.), Research methods in the behavioral sciences. New York: Dryden, 1953. Pp. 243–299.
93.
RileyM. W.RileyJ. W.Jr.TobyJ.Sociological studies in scale analysis. New Brunswick: Rutgers Univer. Press, 1954.
94.
RogersC. R.DymondR. F., (Eds.) Psychotherapy and personality change. Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1954.
95.
SchaferR.Psychoanalytic interpretation in Rorschach testing. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1954.
96.
SherifM.HovlandC. I.Judgmental phenomena and scales of attitude measurement: Placement of items with individual choice of number of categories. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1953, 48, 135–141.
97.
StarS. A.The screening of psychoneurotics in the Army: Technical development of tests. In StoufferS. A., Measurement and prediction. Princeton: Princeton Univer. Press, 1950. Pp. 486–548.
98.
StephensonW.Some observations on Q technique. Psychol Bull., 1952, 49, 483–498.
99.
StephensonW.The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology. Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1953.
TermanL. M.MilesC. C.Sex and personality. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1936.
102.
ThorndikeE. L.Tests of intelligence; reliability, significance, susceptibility to special training and adaptation to the general nature of the task. Sch. & Soc., 1919, 9, 189–195.
103.
ThurstoneL. L.Multiple factor analysis. Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1947.
ThurstoneL. L.The criterion problem in personality research. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1955, 15, 353–361.
106.
ThurstoneL. L.ChaveE. J.The measurement of attitude. Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1929.
107.
TobyJ.TobyM. L.A method of selecting dichotomous items by cross-tabulation. In RileyM. W., Sociological studies in scale analysis. New Brunswick: Rutgers Univer. Press, 1954. Pp. 339–355.
108.
TraversR. M. W.Rational hypotheses in the construction of tests. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1951, 11, 128–137.
109.
TuckerL. R.Some experiments in developing a behaviorally determined scale of vocabulary. Paper read at Amer. Psychol. Ass., San Francisco, Sept., 1955.
110.
TuckerL. R.The objective definition of simple structure in linear factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1955, 20, 209–225.
111.
TukeyJ. W.Discussion: Symposium on statistics for the clinician. J. clin. Psychol., 1950, 6, 61–74.
112.
VernonP. E.The structure of human abilities. London: Methuen, 1950.
113.
WechslerD.The measurement of adult intelligence. (3rd Ed.) Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1944.
114.
WherryR. J.WinerB. J.A method for factoring large numbers of items. Psychometrika, 1953, 18, 161–179.
WinthropH.Semantic factors in the measurement of personality integration. J. soc. Psychol., 1946, 24, 149–175.
117.
WittenbornJ. R.Statistical tests of certain Rorschach assumptions: The internal consistency of scoring categories. J. consult. Psychol., 1950, 14, 1–19.
118.
WittenbornJ. R.Symptom patterns in a group of mental hospital patients. J. consult. Psychol., 1951, 15, 290–302.
119.
WittenbornJ. R.A study of adoptive children. I. Interviews as a source of scores for children and their homes. Psychol. Monogr., 1956, 70, No. 1. (Whole no. 408).
120.
ZubinJ.The determination of response patterns in personality adjustment inventories. J. educ. Psychol., 1937, 28, 401–413.
121.
Technical recommendations for psychological tests and diagnostic techniques.Psychol. Bull. Suppl., 1954, 51, 2, Part 2, 1–38.
122.
Webster's new collegiate dictionary. (2nd Ed.) Springfield, Mass.: Merriam, 1951.