BrunerJ. S.MatterJ.PapanekM. L.Breadth of learning as a function of drive level and mechanization. Psychol. Rev., 1955, 62, 1–10.
2.
KaplanM, The effects of noxious stimulus intensity and duration during intermittent reinforcement and escape behavior. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1952, 45, 538–548.
3.
KendlerH. H.Drive interaction: I. Learning as a function of the simultaneous presence of the hunger and thirst drives. J. exp. Psychol., 1945, 35, 188–198.
4.
KendlerH. H.LawF. E.An experimental test of the selective principle of drive stimuli. J. exp. Psychol., 1950, 40, 299–304.
5.
LevineS.The role of irrelevant drive stimuli in learning. J. exp. Psychol., 1953, 45, 410–416.
6.
MannH. B.WhitneyD. R.On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann. math. Stat., 1947, 18, 50–60.
7.
MontgomeryK. C.The effect of the hunger and thirst drives on exploratory behavior. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1953, 46, 315–319.
8.
MuenzingerK. F.FletcherF. M.Motivation in learning VI. Escape from electric shock compared with hunger-food tension in the visual discrimination habit. J. comp. Psychol., 1936, 22, 79–91.
9.
PowlowskiR. F.The effects of combining hunger and thirst motives in a discrimination habit. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1953, 46, 434–437.
10.
SiegelP. S.Alien drive, habit strength, and resistance to extinction. J. comp. Psychol., 1946, 39, 307–317.
11.
VerplanckW. S.HayesJ. R.Eating and drinking as a function of maintenance schedule. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1953, 46, 327–333.