It is hypothesized that the cancer patient has, more often than chance alone would permit, lost a major cathexis some time before the development of the neoplasm. Certain predictions as to relative cancer mortality rates in different groups are made from this hypothesis. An examination of the statistical literature in the cancer field bears out these predictions and offers additional evidence. The possible validity of this hypothesis suggests that further investigation would be highly desirable.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Heart Association, personal communication, Bellowes, Jan. 14 and Jan. 15, 1954.
2.
AndervontH.The influence of the environment on mammary cancer in mice. J. nat. Cancer Inst., 1944, 4, 579–581.
3.
BigelowG. H.LombardH. L.Cancer and other chronic diseases in Massachusetts. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.1933.
4.
British Registrar-General's Decennial Supplement., 1932London: H. M. Stationery Office, 1932.
5.
BrunerJ. S.GoodmanC. C.Value and need as organizing factors in perception. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1947, 43, 33–44.
6.
CoopermanS.GreenwoodE.Diet and cancer. Reports on Public Health and Medical Subjects. Ministry of Health No. 36. London: H. M. Stationery Office, 1926.
7.
DeenyJ.Mortality from cancer in Eire, 1936–1945. J.M.A. Eire, 1947, 21, 34–41.
8.
DeGraziaS.The political community: A study in anomie. Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1949.
9.
DornH.Cancer and the marital status. Hum. Biol., 1943, 15, 73–79.
10.
EvansE.A psychological study of cancer. New York: Dodd Mead, 1926.
11.
FoqueE.Le problem du cancer dans ses aspects psychiques. Gaz. des Hopitaux., 1931, 104, 827–833.
GreeneW.Psychological factors in reticuloendothelial disease. Psychosomat. Med., 1954, 16, 220–230.
14.
HerringR. A.The relationship of marital status in females to mortality of the breast, female genital organs and other sites: A statistical study. Bull. Amer. Soc. Control Cancer, 1936, 18, 4–8.
15.
HoffmanF. C.The mortality from cancer throughout the world. Newark: Prudential Press, 1915.
16.
LeShanL.WorthingtonR.Some psychologic correlates of neoplastic disease: A preliminary report. J. clin. exp. Psychopath. & Quart. Rev. Psychiat. Neurol., 1955, 16, 281–288.
17.
LeShanL.WorthingtonR.Personality as a factor in the pathogenesis of cancer: A review of the literature. Brit. J. med. Psychol., 1956, 29, 49–56.
18.
LewisN. D. C.Research in dementia praecox, No. 4. New York: National Committee for Mental Health, 1936.
19.
LevyD.Experiments on the sucking reflex and social behavior in dogs. Amer. J. Orthopsychiat., 1934, 4, 203–224.
20.
LombardH. L.PotterE.Epidemiological aspects of cancer of the cervix. 2: Hereditary and environmental factors. Cancer, 1950, 3, 960–969.
21.
MeerlooJ. A. M.Psychological implications of malignant growth. Brit. J. med. Psychol., 1954, 27, 210–215.
22.
OliverC. B.BellE.BittnerJ. J.DennisC.O'BrienW. A.TreloarA. E.VisscherM. B.The relationship between pregnancies and age of occurrence of breast cancer in the human. Minn. J. Med., 1946, 29, 1230–1232.
23.
PearlR.Introduction to medical biometry and statistics. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1940.
24.
PellerS.Cancer and its relationship to pregnancy, to delivery and to marital and social status. Surg. Gyn. Obst., 1940, 71, 1–8; 181–186.
25.
ScheflinA.Malignant tumors in the institutionalized psychotic population. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1951, 66, 145–155.
26.
SnowH.Cancer and the cancer process. London: Churchill, 1893.
27.
U. S. Public Health Service, Div. of Public Health Methods.Personal communication from Theodore D. Woolsey, Jan. 19, 1954.
28.
WhiteW. A.The social significance of mental disease. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1929, 22, 873–900.