Experimental studies of ego involvement are reviewed with respect to definitions of the concept, procedures and designs used, and effects of these on retention, perception, motor responses, problem solving, preferences, evaluative judgments, set-shifting tasks, level of aspiration, and test responses. Generalizing from their review, the writers propose the hypothesis that varying reactions to ego involving conditions reflect, at least in part, a continuum of motivation. The relationship between degree of ego involvement and efficacy of response appears to be a curvilinear one, inhibitive or disruptive at the extremes and optimally facilitative near the middle. There also appears to be a common personality dimension which is responsive to ego-involving conditions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbornM.The influence of experimentally induced failure on the retention of material acquired through set and incidental learning. J. exp. Psychol., 1953, 45, 225–231.
AllportG. W.Effect: A secondary principle of learning. Psychol. Rev., 1946, 53, 335–347.
4.
AlperT. G.Memory for completed and incompleted tasks as a function of personality: An analysis of group data. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1946, 41, 403–420.
5.
AlperT. G.Task-orientation vs. ego-orientation in learning and retention. Amer. J. Psychol., 1946, 59, 236–248.
6.
AlperT. G.Memory for completed and incompleted tasks as a function of personality: Correlation between experimental and personality data. J. Pers., 1948, 17, 104–137.
7.
AlperT. G.Task-orientation and ego-orientation as factors in reminiscence. J. exp. Psychol., 1948, 38, 224–238.
8.
AlperT. G.The interrupted task method in studies of selective recall: A re-evaluation of some recent experiments. Psychol. Rev., 1952, 59, 71–88.
9.
AlperT. G.BlackA.The effect of instruction, task, and population-sample on mental set. Amer. J. Psychol., 1949, 62, 295–299.
10.
AlperT. G.KorchinS. J.Memory for socially relevant material. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1952, 47, 25–37.
11.
AtkinsonJ. W.The achievement motive and recall of interrupted and completed tasks. J. exp. Psychol., 1953, 46, 381–390.
12.
BarronF.An ego-strength scale which predicts response to psychotherapy. J. consult. Psychol., 1953, 17, 327–333.
13.
BaytonJ. A.Interrelations between levels of aspiration, performance, and estimates of past experience. J. exp. Psychol., 1943, 33, 1–21.
14.
BeierE.The effect of induced anxiety on flexibility of intellectual functioning. Psychol. Monogr., 1951, 65, No. 9 (Whole No. 326).
15.
BenjaminsJ.Changes in performance in relation to influences upon self-conceptualization. Unpublished doctor's dissertation, Ohio State Univer., 1949. In Ohio State Univer. abstracts of doctoral dissertations 1949–50Columbus, Ohio: 1951. Pp. 41–47.
16.
BertocciP. A.The psychological self, the ego, and personality. Psychol. Rev., 1945, 52, 91–99.
17.
BillsR. E.A comparison of scores on the Index of Adjustment and Values with behavior in level-of-aspiration tasks. J. consult. Psychol., 1953, 17, 206–212.
18.
BillsR. E.Rorschach characteristics of persons scoring high and low in acceptance of self. J. consult. Psychol., 1953, 17, 36–38.
19.
BillsR. E.A validation of changes in scores on the Index of Adjustment and Values as measures of changes in emotionality. J. consult. Psychol., 1953, 17, 135–138.
20.
BillsR. E.Self concepts and Rorschach signs of depression. J. consult. Psychol., 1954, 18, 135–137.
21.
BillsR. E.VanceE. L.McLeanO. S.An index of adjustment and values. J. consult. Psychol., 1951, 15, 257–261.
22.
BlantonR. L.The effect of induced anxiety on flexibility of set-shifting in rigid and non-rigid subjects. Unpublished doctor's dissertation, Vanderbilt Univer., 1952.
23.
BrownR. W.A determinant of the relationship between rigidity and authoritarianism. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1953, 48, 469–476.
24.
BrownfainJ. J.Stability of the self-concept as a dimension of personality. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1952, 47, 597–606.
25.
CaldenG.CohenL. B.The relationship of ego-involvement and test definition to Rorschach test performance. J. proj. Tech., 1953, 17, 300–311.
26.
CalvinA. D.HoltzmanW. H.Adjustment and the discrepancy between self-concept and inferred self. J. consult. Psychol., 1953, 17, 39–44.
27.
CarlsonV. R.LazarusR. S.A repetition of Meyer Williams' study of intellectual control under stress and associated Rorschach factors. J. consult. Psychol., 1953, 17, 247–253.
28.
CastanedaA.PalermoD. S.Psychomotor performance as a function of amount of training and stress. J. exp. Psychol., 1955, 50, 175–179.
29.
ChanskyN. M.Threat as a factor in recall in a retroactive paradigm. J. Psychol., 1956, 41, 3–10.
30.
CheinI.The awareness of self and the structure of the ego. Psychol. Rev., 1944, 51, 304–314.
31.
CohenL. D.Level-of-aspiration behavior and feelings of adequacy and self-acceptance. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1954, 49, 84–86.
32.
CombsA. W.TaylorC.The effect of the perception of mild degrees of threat on performance. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1952, 47, 420–424.
33.
CookR. A.Identification and ego defensiveness in thematic apperception. J. proj. Tech., 1953, 17, 312–319.
34.
CowenE. L.The influence of varying degrees of psychological stress on problem-solving rigidity. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1952, 47, 512–519.
35.
CowenE. L.Stress reduction and problem-solving rigidity. J. consult. Psychol., 1952, 16, 425–428.
36.
CowenE. L.The “Negative Self Concept” as a personality measure. J. consult. Psychol., 1954, 18, 138–142.
37.
CowenE. L.HeilizerF.AxelrodH. S.Self-concept conflict indicators and learning. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1955, 51, 242–245.
38.
CoxF. N.SarasonS. B.Test anxiety and Rorschach performance. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1954, 49, 371–377.
39.
DiggoryJ. C.Responses to experimentally induced failure. Amer. J. Psychol., 1949, 62, 48–61.
40.
DorisJ.SarasonS. B.Test anxiety and blame assignment in a failure situation. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1955, 50, 335–338.
41.
EdwardsA. L.Political frames of reference as a factor influencing recognition. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1941, 36, 34–50.
42.
EdwardsA. L.Experimental design in psychological research. New York: Rinehart, 1950.
43.
EriksenC. W.Defense against ego-threat in memory and perception. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1952, 47, 230–235.
44.
EriksenC. W.Individual differences in defensive forgetting. J. exp. Psychol., 1952, 44, 442–447.
45.
EriksenC. W.The case for perceptual defense. Psychol. Rev., 1954, 61, 175–182.
46.
EriksenC. W.Psychological defenses and “ego strength” in the recall of completed and incompleted tasks. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1954, 49, 45–50.
47.
EriksenC. W.LazarusR. S.StrangeJ. R.Stress and its personality correlates. J. Pers., 1952, 20, 277–286.
48.
FilerR. J.Frustration, satisfaction, and other factors affecting the attractiveness of goal objects. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1952, 47, 203–212.
49.
FlavellJ. H.Selective forgetting as a function of the induction and subsequent removal of ego-threat. Unpublished master's dissertation, Clark Univer., 1952.
50.
FrankJ. D.Individual differences in certain aspects of the level of aspiration. Amer. J. Psychol., 1935, 47, 119–128.
51.
FrankJ. D.Some psychological determinants of the level of aspiration. Amer. J. Psychol., 1935, 47, 285–293.
52.
FrankJ. D.Recent studies of the level of aspiration. Psychol. Bull., 1941, 38, 218–226.
FrenchE. G.Interrelation among some measures of rigidity under stress and non-stress conditions. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1955, 51, 114–118.
55.
FrenchE. G.Some characteristics of achievement motivation. J. exp. Psychol., 1955, 50, 232–236.
56.
GardnerJ. W.The relation of certain personality variables to level of aspiration. J. Psychol., 1940, 9, 191–206.
57.
GebhardM. E.The effect of success and failure upon the attractiveness of activities as a function of experience, expectation and need. J. exp. Psychol., 1948, 38, 371–388.
58.
GlixmanA. F.An analysis of the use of the interruption-technique in experimental studies of “repression.”Psychol. Bull., 1948, 45, 491–506.
59.
GlixmanA. F.Recall of completed and incompleted activities under varying degrees of stress. J. exp. Psychol., 1949, 39, 281–295.
60.
GouldR.An experimental analysis of ‘level of aspiration.’Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 1939, 21, 3–115.
61.
HarveyO. J.SherifM.Level of aspiration as a case of judgmental activity in which ego-involvements operate as factors. Sociometry, 1951, 14, 121–147.
62.
HaysD. G.Situational instructions and task order in recall for completed and interrupted tasks. J. exp. Psychol., 1952, 44, 434–437.
63.
HilgardE. R.Human motives and the concept of self. Amer. Psychologist, 1949, 4, 374–382.
64.
HoltR. R.Effects of ego-involvement upon levels of aspiration. Psychiatry, 1945, 8, 299–317.
65.
HoltR. R.Level of aspiration: Ambition or defense?J. exp. Psychol., 1946, 36, 398–416.
66.
HoppeF.Erfolg und Misserfolg. Psychol. Forsch., 1930, 14, 1–63.
67.
HowieD.An analysis of reasons given for answers to personality questionnaire items as indicating differences in ego-involvement. Aust. J. Psychol., 1952, 4, 50–61.
68.
HuntleyC. W.Judgments of self based upon records of expressive behavior. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1940, 35, 398–427.
69.
HuttM. L.A clinical study of “consecutive” and “adaptive” testing with the revised Stanford-Binet. J. consult. Psychol., 1947, 11, 93–103.
70.
IversonM. A.A factor analysis of anger ratings assigned to five classes of motivational situations. Psychol. Monogr., 1955, 69, No. 15 (Whole No. 400).
71.
JostK. C.The level of aspiration of schizophrenic and normal subjects. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1954, 49, 51–58.
72.
JourardS. M.Ego strength and the recall of tasks. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1954, 49, 51–58.
73.
KauslerD. H.A study of the relationship between ego-involvement and learning. J. Psychol., 1951, 32, 225–230.
74.
KayeD.KirschnerP.MandlerG.The effect of test anxiety on memory span in a group test situation. J. consult. Psychol., 1953, 17, 265–266.
75.
KendlerT. S.The effect of success and failure on the recall of tasks. J. gen. Psychol., 1949, 41, 79–87.
76.
KleinG. S.The personal world through perception. In BlakeR. R.RamseyG. V. (Eds.), Perception: An approach to personality. New York: Ronald, 1951. Pp. 328–355.
77.
KleinG. S.SchoenfeldN.The influence of ego-involvement on confidence. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1941, 36, 249–258.
78.
KleinS. J.Muscle action potentials produced in various ways and their relation to quantitative and qualitative measures of ergographic work. Amer. Psychologist, 1952, 7, 264–265. (Abstract).
79.
KleinS. J.The summation of muscle tensions due to stress. Amer. Psychologist, 1955, 10, 451–452. (Abstract).
80.
KornerI. N.Experimental investigation of some aspects of the problem of repression: Repressive forgetting. Teach. Coll. Contr. Educ., 1950, No. 970.
81.
LairdD. A.Changes in motor control and individual variations under the influence of “razzing.”J. exp. Psychol., 1923, 6, 236–246.
82.
LantzB.Some dynamic aspects of success and failure. Psychol. Monogr., 1945, 59, No. 1 (Whole No. 271).
83.
LanzettaJ. T.HaefnerD.LanghamP.AxelrodH.Some effects of situational threat on group behavior. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1954, 49, 445–453.
84.
LazarusR. S.DeeseJ.OslerS. F.The effects of psychological stress upon performance. Psychol. Bull., 1952, 49, 293–317.
85.
LazarusR. S.EriksenC. W.The effects of failure stress upon skilled performance. J. exp. Psychol., 1952, 43, 100–105.
86.
LazarusR. S.EriksenC. W.FondaC. P.Personality dynamics in auditory perception. J. Pers., 1951, 19, 471–482.
87.
LazarusR. S.LongoN.The consistency of psychological defenses against threat. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1953, 48, 495–499.
88.
LevanwayR. W.The effect of stress on expressed attitudes toward self and others. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1955, 50, 225–226.
89.
LevittE. E.Cognitive distortion and ego-involvement. J. Pers., 1950, 18, 212–220.
90.
LewinK.DemboT.FestingerL.SearsP. S.Level of aspiration. In HuntJ. McV. (Ed.), Personality and the behavior disorders. New York: Ronald, 1944. Pp. 333–378.
91.
LewisH. B.FranklinM.An experimental study of the role of the ego in work. II. The significance of task-orientation in work. J. exp. Psychol., 1944, 34, 195–215.
92.
LucasJ. D.The interactive effects of anxiety, failure, and intraserial duplication. Amer. J. Psychol., 1952, 65, 59–66.
93.
McCarthySister M. V.An empirical investigation of the social influence upon judgments requiring varying degrees of ego-involvement. Unpublished master's dissertation, Catholic Univer., 1951.
94.
McClellandD. C.ApicellaF. S.A functional classification of verbal reactions to experimentally induced failure. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1945, 40, 376–390.
95.
McClellandD. C.ApicellaF. S.Reminiscence following experimentally induced failure. J. exp. Psychol., 1947, 37, 159–169.
96.
McClellandD. C.AtkinsonJ. W.ClarkR. A.The projective expression of needs. III. The effect of ego-involvement, success, and failure on perception. J. Psychol., 1949, 27, 311–330.
McClellandD. C.ClarkR. A.RobyT. B.AtkinsonJ. W.The projective expression of needs. IV. The effect of the need for achievement on thematic apperception. J. exp. Psychol., 1949, 39, 242–255.
99.
McGeheeW.Judgment and the level of aspiration. J. gen. Psychol., 1940, 22, 3–15.
100.
McKeachieW. J.PollieD.SpersmanJ.Relieving anxiety in classroom examinations. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1955, 50, 93–98.
101.
McKinneyF.Certain emotional factors in learning and efficiency. J. gen. Psychol., 1933, 9, 101–116.
102.
McKinneyF.StrotherG. B.HinesR. R.AlleeR. A.Experimental frustration in a group test situation. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1951, 46, 316–323.
103.
MandlerG.SarasonS. B.A study of anxiety and learning. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1952, 47, 166–173.
104.
MarksE.Skin color judgments of Negro college students. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1943, 38, 370–376.
105.
MarrowA. J.Goal tensions and recall: I. J. gen. Psychol., 1938, 19, 3–35.
106.
MarrowA. J.Goal tensions and recall: II. J. gen. Psychol., 1938, 19, 37–64.
107.
MeltzoffJ.The effect of mental set and item structure upon response to a projective test. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1951, 46, 177–189.
108.
MohsinS. M.Effect of frustration on problem-solving behavior. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1954, 49, 152–155.
109.
MoldawskyS.MoldawskyP. C.Digit span as an anxiety indicator. J. consult. Psychol., 1952, 16, 115–118.
110.
MowrerO. H.The law of effect and ego psychology. Psychol. Rev., 1946, 53, 321–334.
111.
MunnN. L.Psychology. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1951.
112.
OslerS. F.Intellectual performance as a function of two types of psychological stress. J. exp. Psychol., 1954, 47, 115–121.
113.
PallyS.Cognitive rigidity as a function of threat. Unpublished doctor's dissertation, Univer. of Pennsylvania, 1951.
114.
PostmanL.BrunerJ. S.Perception under stress. Psychol. Rev., 1948, 55, 314–323.
115.
PostmanL.MurphyG.The factor of attitude in associative memory. J. exp. Psychol., 1943, 33, 228–238.
116.
PostmanL.SolomonR. L.Perceptual sensitivity to completed and incompleted tasks. J. Pers., 1950, 18, 347–358.
117.
PrenticeW. C. H.The interruption of tasks. Psychol. Rev., 1944, 51, 329–340.
118.
PrestonM. G.BaytonJ. A.Differential effect of a social variable upon three levels of aspiration. J. exp. Psychol., 1941, 29, 351–369.
119.
RapaportD.Emotions and memory. New York: International Univer. Press, 1950.
120.
ReuderM. E.The relationship between two kinds of instruction and two levels of problem difficulty in their effects on muscular tension levels during problem solution. Unpublished doctor's dissertation, Univer. of Pennsylvania, 1951.
121.
ReuderM. E.The effect of ego-orientation and problem-difficulty on muscle action potentials. J. exp. Psychol., 1956, 51, 142–148.
122.
RiceP. B.The ego and the law of effect. Psychol. Rev., 1946, 53, 307–320.
123.
RobertsG. E.A study of the validity of the Index of Adjustment and Values. J. consult. Psychol., 1952, 16, 302–304.
124.
RosenthalB. G.Hypnotic recall of material learned under anxiety and non-anxiety producing conditions. J. exp. Psychol., 1944, 34, 369–389.
125.
RosenzweigS.Preferences in the repetition of successful and unsuccessful activities as a function of age and personality. J. genet. Psychol., 1933, 42, 423–441.
126.
RosenzweigS.The recall of finished and unfinished tasks as affected by the purpose with which they were performed. Psychol. Bull., 1933, 30, 698. (Abstract).
127.
RosenzweigS.III, Need-persistive and ego-defensive reactions to frustration as demonstrated by an experiment on repression. Psychol. Rev., 1941, 48, 347–349.
128.
RosenzweigS.An experimental study of “repression” with special reference to need-persistive and ego-defensive reactions to frustration. J. exp. Psychol., 1943, 32, 64–74.
129.
RosenzweigS.The investigation of repression as an instance of experimental idiodynamics. Psychol. Rev., 1952, 59, 339–345.
130.
RosenzweigS.MasonG.An experimental study of memory in relation to the theory of repression. Brit. J. Psychol., 1934, 24, 247–265.
131.
RosenzweigS.SarasonS.An experimental study of the triadic hypothesis: Reaction to frustration, ego-defense, and hypnotizability. I. Correlational approach. Charact. & Pers., 1942, 11, 1–19.
132.
RossB. M.RupelJ. W.GrantD. A.Effects of personal, impersonal, and physical stress upon cognitive behavior in a card sorting problem. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1952, 47, 546–551.
133.
RussellW. A.Retention of verbal material as a function of motivating instructions and experimentally-induced failure. J. exp. Psychol., 1952, 43, 207–216.
134.
SanfordR. N.Age as a factor in the recall of interrupted tasks. Psychol. Rev., 1946, 53, 234–240.
135.
SanfordR. N.RisserJ.What are the conditions of self-defensive forgetting? J. Pers., 1948, 17, 244–260.
136.
SarasonS. B.The test situation and the problem of prediction. J. clin. Psychol., 1950, 6, 387–392.
137.
SarasonS. B.MandlerG.Some correlates of test anxiety. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1952, 47, 810–817.
138.
SarasonS. B.MandlerG.CraighillP. G.The effect of differential instructions on anxiety and learning. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1952, 47, 561–565.
139.
SarasonS.RosenzweigS.An experimental study of the triadic hypothesis: Reaction to frustration, ego-defense, and hypnotizability. II. Thematic apperception approach. Charact. & Pers., 1942, 11, 150–165.
140.
SearsP. S.Levels of aspiration in academically successful and unsuccessful children. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1940, 35, 498–535.
141.
SearsP. S.Level of aspiration in relation to some variables of personality: Clinical studies. J. soc. Psychol., 1941, 14, 311–336.
142.
SearsR. R.Initiation of the repression sequence by experienced failure. J. exp. Psychol., 1937, 20, 570–580.
143.
ShawF. J.Two determinants of selective forgetting. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1944, 39, 434–445.
144.
ShawF. J.SpoonerA.Selective forgetting when the subject is not ‘ego-involved.’J. exp. Psychol., 1945, 35, 242–247.
145.
SherifM.Some methodological remarks related to experimentation in social psychology. (Illustrated by a review of current experimental work on ego-involvements.)Int. J. Opin. Attitude Res., 1947, 1 (2), 71–93.
146.
SherifM.CantrilH.The psychology of ego-involvements: Social attitudes and identifications. New York: Wiley, 1947.
147.
SingerJ. L.Personal and environmental determinants of perception in a size constancy experiment. J. exp. Psychol., 1952, 43, 420–427.
148.
SmithJ. G.Influence of failure, expressed hostility, and stimulus characteristics on verbal learning and recognition. J. Pers., 1954, 22, 475–493.
149.
SmithS.GeorgeC. E.Rorschach factors related to experimental stress. J. consult. Psychol., 1951, 15, 190–195.
150.
SmockC. D.The influence of psychological stress on the “intolerance of ambiguity.”J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1955, 50, 177–182.
151.
SmockC. D.The influence of stress on the perception of incongruity. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1955, 50, 354–356.
152.
StaffordJ. W.HsüE. H.Experimental frustration in human adults. J. clin. Psychol., 1948, 4, 269–276.
153.
StopolM. S.The consistency of stress tolerance. J. Pers., 1954, 23, 13–29.
154.
StopolM. S.Rorschach performance in relation to two types of stress. J. consult. Psychol., 1954, 18, 11–15.
155.
StrotherG. B.CookD. M.Neurocirculatory reactions and a group stress situation. J. consult. Psychol., 1953, 17, 267–268.
156.
SullivanE. B.Attitude in relation to learning. Psychol. Monogr., 1927, 36, No. 3 (Whole No. 169).
157.
SymondsP. M.The ego and the self. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1951.
158.
TaftR.Selective recall and memory distortion of favorable and unfavorable material. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1954, 49, 23–28.
159.
TresseltM. E.LevyB.Recognition for ego-involved materials. J. Psychol., 1949, 27, 73–78.
160.
TresseltM. E.MayznerM. S.A further experiment in the recognition of ego-involved materials. J. Psychol., 1954, 37, 135–138.
161.
UnderwoodB. J.Experimental psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1949.
162.
VervilleE.The effect of emotional and motivational sets on the perception of incomplete pictures. J. genet. Psychol., 1946, 69, 133–145.
163.
WallenD.Ego involvement as a determinant of selective forgetting. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1942, 37, 20–29.
164.
WebbW. W.Conceptual ability of schizophrenics as a function of threat of failure. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1955, 50, 221–224.
165.
WickensD. D.The effect of competition on the performance of tasks of differing degrees of difficulty. Psychol. Bull., 1942, 39, 595. (Abstract).
166.
WilliamsM.An experimental study of intellectual control under stress and associated Rorschach factors. J. consult. Psychol., 1947, 11, 21–29.
167.
WilliamsM.The effects of experimentally induced needs upon retention. J. exp. Psychol., 1950, 40, 139–151.
168.
WilliamsM.Rate of learning as a function of ego-alien material. J. Pers., 1951, 19, 324–331.
169.
WolffW.The experimental study of forms of expression. Charact. & Pers., 1933, 2, 168–176.
170.
ZellerA. F.An experimental analogue of repression: II. The effect of individual failure and success on memory measured by relearning. J. exp. Psychol., 1950, 40, 411–422.
171.
ZellerA. F.An experimental analogue of repression: III. The effect of induced failure and success on memory measured by recall. J. exp. Psychol., 1951, 42, 32–38.
172.
ZilligM.Einstellung und Aussage. Z. Psychol., 1928, 106, 58–106.
173.
ZuckermanM.The effect of threat on perceptual affect in a group. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1951, 46, 529–533.
