AdelmanH. M.MaatschJ. L.Resistance to extinction as a function of the type of response elicited by frustration. J. exp. Psychol., 1955, 50, 61–65.
2.
SheffieldV. F.Extinction as a function of partial reinforcement and distribution of practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1949, 39, 511–526.
3.
SheffieldV. F.Resistance to extinction as a function of the distribution of extinction trials. J. exp. Psychol., 1950, 40, 305–313.
4.
StanleyW. C.Extinction as a function of the spacing of extinction trials. J. exp. Psychol., 1952, 43, 249–260.
5.
StanleyW. C.RoweM. I.Extinction by omission of food as a function of goal-box confinement. J. exp. Psychol., 1954, 48, 271–274.
6.
WeinstockS.Resistance to extinction of a running response following partial reinforcement under widely spaced trials. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1954, 47, 318–322.
WilsonW.WeissE. J.AmselA.Two tests of the Sheffield hypothesis concerning resistance to extinction, partial reinforcement, and distribution of practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1955, 50, 51–60.
