BrandweinP. F.The gifted student as a future scientist. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1955.
2.
CriswellJ. H.The measurement of group integration. Sociometry, 1947, 10, 259–267.
3.
EdwardsA. L.Statistical methods for the behavioral sciences. New York: Rinehart, 1954.
4.
KubieL. S.Problems of the scientific career. Amer. Scientist, 1953, 41, 596–613.
5.
KubieL. S.Socio-economic problems of the young scientist. Amer. Scientist, 1954, 42, 104–112.
6.
MassarikF.TannenbaumR.KahaneM.WechslerI.Sociometric choice and organization effectiveness: a multi-relational approach. Sociometry, 1953, 16, 211–238.
7.
MorenoJ. L.Origins and foundations of interpersonal theory, sociometry, and sociology. Sociometry, 1949, 12, 235–254.
8.
ProctorC. H.LoomisC. P.Analysis of sociometric data. In JahodaM.DeutschM.CookS. W., Research methods in social sciences, Part 2. New York: Dryden, 1951.
9.
RobyT. B.Relationship between sociometric measures and performance in medium bomber crews. USAF hum. Resour. res. Bull., 1953, No. 53–54.
10.
StogdillR. M.The organization of working relationships; twenty sociometric indices. Sociometry, 1951, 14, 366–374.
11.
WhiteC.The use of ranks in a test of significance for comparing two treatments. Biometrics, 1952, 8, 33–41.
12.
ZelenyL. D.Status: its measurement and control in education. Sociometry, 1941, 4, 193–204.
13.
American Psychological Association, Division 16 subcommittee report: Needed research on gifted children. Amer. Psychologist, 1954, 9, 77.
