Undergraduates' Intentions to Take a Second Language Proficiency Test: A Comparison of Predictions from the Theory of Planned Behavior and Social Cognitive Theory
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2010
Undergraduates' Intentions to Take a Second Language Proficiency Test: A Comparison of Predictions from the Theory of Planned Behavior and Social Cognitive Theory
English competency has become essential for obtaining a better job or succeeding in higher education in Taiwan. Thus, passing the General English Proficiency Test is important for college students in Taiwan. The current study applied Ajzen's theory of planned behavior and the notions of outcome expectancy and self-efficacy from Bandura's social cognitive theory to investigate college students' intentions to take the General English Proficiency Test. The formal sample consisted of 425 undergraduates (217 women, 208 men; M age = 19.5 yr., SD = 1.3). The theory of planned behavior showed greater predictive ability (R2 = 33%) of intention than the social cognitive theory (R2 = 7%) in regression analysis and made a unique contribution to prediction of actual test-taking behavior one year later in logistic regression. Within-model analyses indicated that subjective norm in theory of planned behavior and outcome expectancy in social cognitive theory are crucial factors in predicting intention. Implications for enhancing undergraduates' intentions to take the English proficiency test are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AjzenI. (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
2.
AjzenI. (2001) Predicting hunting intentions and behavior: an application of the theory of planned behavior. Leisure Sciences, 23, 165–178.
3.
ArmitageC. J., & ConnerM. (1999) Distinguishing perceptions of control from self-efficacy: prediction consumption of a low-fat diet using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 72–90.
4.
ArmitageC. J., & ConnerM. (2001) Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: a meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–475.
5.
BanduraA. (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
6.
BanduraA. (1982) Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147.
7.
BanduraA. (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8.
BanduraA. (1988) Organizational application of social cognitive theory. Australian Journal of Management, 13, 275–302.
9.
BanduraA. (1989) Social cognitive theory. In VastaR. (Ed.), Annals of child development: six theories of child development. Vol. 6. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Pp. 1–60.
10.
BanduraA. (1997) Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
11.
BebetsosE.ChroniS., & TheodorakisY. (2002) Physically active students' intentions and self-efficacy towards healthy eating. Psychological Reports, 91, 485–495.
12.
Broadhead-FearnD., & WhiteK. M. (2006) The role of self-efficacy in predicting rule-following behaviors in shelters for homeless youth: a test of the theory of planned behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 146, 307–325.
13.
ChiangL., & HuangC-Y. (2007) Use of pirated compact discs on four college campuses: a perspective from theory of planned behavior. Psychological Reports, 101, 361–364.
14.
DaviesJ.FoxallG. R., & PallisterJ. (2002) Beyond the intention-behaviour mythology: an integrated model of recycling. Marketing Theory, 2, 29–113.
15.
FishbeinM., & AjzenI. (1975) Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. New York: Wiley.
16.
KashimaY.YamaguchiS.KimU.ChoiS. C.GelfandM., & YukiM. (1995) Culture, gender, and self: a perspective from individualism-collectivism research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 925–937.
17.
KimU. (1997) Asian collectivism: an indigenous perspective. In KaoH. S. R. & SinhaD. (Eds.), Asian perspectives on psychology. New Delhi, India: Sage. Pp. 147–163.
18.
KungC. (2007) Traditional Chinese culture and a harmonious society: education on raising the quality of spirituality. Taipei, Taiwan: Psychological Publishing.
19.
MadduxJ. E. (1991) Self-efficacy. In SnyderC. R. & ForsythD. R. (Eds.), Handbook of social and clinical psychology: the health perspective. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press. Pp. 57–78.
20.
MadduxJ. E. (2000) Self-efficacy: the power of believing you can. In SnyderC. R. & ForsythD. R. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology: self-efficacy. New York: Oxford Univer. Press. Pp. 1–30.
21.
MansteadA. S. R., & van EekelenS. A. M. (1998) Distinguishing between perceived behavioral control and self-efficacy in the domain of academic achievement intentions and behaviors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1375–1392.
22.
MarkusH. R., & KitayamaS. (1991) Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.
23.
MussweilerT., & RuterK. (2003) What friends are for! The use of routine standards in social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 467–481.
24.
NormanP., & HoyleS. (2004) The theory of planned behavior and breast self-examination: distinguishing between perceived control and self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 694–708.
25.
PajaresF. (1996) Self-efficacy beliefs and mathematical problem solving of gifted students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 325–344.
26.
PoveyR.ConnerM.SparksP.JamesR., & ShepherdR. (2000) Application of the theory of planned behaviour to two dietary behaviours: roles of perceived control and self-efficacy. British Journal of Health Psychology, 5, 121–139.
27.
PrislinR., & KovrlijaN. (1992) Predicting behavior of high and low self-monitors: an application of the theory of planned behavior. Psychological Reports, 70, 1131–1138.
28.
SchunkD. H. (1995) Self-efficacy and education and instruction. In MadduxJ. E. (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: theory, research, and application. New York: Plenum Press. Pp. 281–303.
29.
ShellD. F.MurphyC. C., & BruningR. (1989) Self-efficacy and outcome expectancy mechanisms in reading and writing achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 91–100.
30.
SuS-W. (2005) Graduation threshold of English competency: a needs analysis from the perspective of technological institute students. Educational Review, 24, 47–66.
31.
TerryD. J., & O'LearyJ. E. (1995) The theory of planned behaviour: the effects of perceived behavioural control and self-efficacyBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 199–220.
32.
TheodorakisY., & PapaioannouA. (2004) Relations between family structure and students' health-related attitudes and behaviors. Psychological Reports, 95, 851–858.
33.
TsigilisN.TsioumisK., & GregoriadisA. (2007) Applicability of the planned behavior theory to attitudes of students in early childhood education toward teaching culturally diverse classes: the role of self-identityPsychological Reports, 100, 1123–1128.
34.
YangM-L.ChuangH-H., & ChiouW-B. (2009) Long-term costs of inflated self-estimate on academic performance among adolescent students: a case of second-language achievements. Psychological Reports, 105, 1–11.
35.
ZimmermanB. J. (2000) Self-efficacy: an essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82–91.
36.
ZinbargR. E.RevelleW.YovelI., & LiW. (2005) Cronbach's α, Revelle's β, and McDonald's ωH: their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70, 123–133.
