A 2009 study by Masip, et al. contended that the truth bias appears in brief communications. They demonstrated a strong truth bias when truth–lie judgments were made at the beginning of the judged statement. Over time, a decrease in the truth bias and an increase in accuracy were observed. The improvement was explained by systematic information processing. The present paper suggests an alternative explanation, which rests on the phenomenon of regression toward the mean.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BondC. F.Jr., & DePauloB. M. (2006) Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 214–234.
2.
MasipJ.GarridoE., & HerreroC. (2009) Heuristic versus systematic processing of information in detecting deception: questioning the truth bias. Psychological Reports, 105, 11–36.
3.
ReinhardM. C., & SporerS. L. (2008) Verbal and nonverbal behaviour as a basis for credibility attribution: the impact of task involvement and cognitive capacity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 477–488.
