Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2008-12
Update on the Debate about the Existence and Utility of the Big Five: A Ten-Year Follow-Up on Carroll's “The Five-Factor Personality Model: How Complete and Satisfactory is it?”
This paper is a follow-up comment on John B. Carroll's critique of the Big Five Model and his suggestion years ago on how to design and conduct research properly on the structure of personality and its assessment. The status of research on personality factor models is discussed, and conclusions are reached regarding the likely consequences and further prospects of the failure of personality theorists and practitioners to follow through on Carroll's poignant suggestion for required effort.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlujaA.RollandJ. P.GarciaL. F.RossierJ. (2007) Dimensionality of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and its relationships with the three- and the five-factor personality models. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 246–249.
2.
BlockJ. (1995a) The contrarian view of the Five-Factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187–215.
3.
BlockJ. (1995b) Going beyond the five factors given: rejoinder to Costa & McCrae (1995), Goldberg & Saucier (1995). Psychological Bulletin, 117, 226–229.
4.
BoyleG. J.StankovL.CattellR. B. (1995) Measurement and statistical models in the study of personality and intelligence. In SaklofskeD. H.ZeidnerM. (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence. New York: Plenum. Pp. 417–446.
5.
BorgattaE. E. (1964) The structure of personality characteristics. Behavioral Science, 9, 8–17.
6.
BraunH. I.JacksonD. N.WileyD. E. (Eds.) (2002) The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 97–126.
7.
BussA. H.PlominR. (1975) A temperament theory of personality development. New York: Wiley.
8.
ButcherJ. N. (1997) International adaptations of the MMPI–2: a growing trend in international applied psychology. SPA Exchange, Fall/Winter, p. 5.
9.
ButcherJ. N.RouseS. S. (1991) Personality, individual differences, and clinical assessment. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 87–111.
10.
CarrollJ. B. (1960) IBM 704 program for generalized analytical rotation in factor analysis. (Unpublished manuscript, Harvard Univer.).
11.
CarrollJ. B. (1993) Human cognitive abilities: a survey of factor analytic studies. New York: Cambridge Univer. Press.
12.
CarrollJ. B. (1997a) Can personality and intelligence be “integrated”? [Review ofSakofskeD. H.ZeidverM. (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence. New York: Plenum, 1995]. Contemporary Psychology, 42, 215–217.
13.
CarrollJ. B. (1997b) The Five-Factor Personality Model: how complete and satisfactory is it?Invited address delivered at an educational testing service conference honoring Samuel Messick, Princeton, New Jersey, September 18–19.
14.
CarrollJ. B. (2002) The Five-Factor Personality Model: how complete and satisfactory is it? In BraunH. I.JacksonD. N.WileyD. E. (Eds.), The role of constructs in educational and psychological measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 97–126.
15.
CattellH. E. P. (1993) Comment on Goldberg. American Psychologist, 48, 1302–1303.
16.
CattellH. E. P. (1996) The original big five: a historical perspective. European Review of Applied Psychology, 46, 5–14.
17.
CattellR. B. (1965) The scientific basis of personality. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
18.
ChapmanB. P. (2007) Band width and fidelity on the NEO Five-Factor Inventory: replicability and reliability of Saucier's (1998) item cluster subcomponents. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 220–234.
19.
ChildC. (1998) Some technical problems in the use of personality measures in occupational settings illustrated using the “Big Five.” In Shorrocks-TaylorS. (Ed.), Directions in educational psychology. London: Whurr. Pp. 346–364.
20.
ComreyA. (1980) Handbook of interpretation for the Comrey Personality Scale. San Diego, CA: Educational & Industrial Testing Service.
CostaP. T.Jr.McCraeR. R. (1992) Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 653–665.
23.
CostaP. T.Jr.McCraeR. R. (1995) The NEO Personality Inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
24.
CloningerC. R.SvrarkicD. M. (1994) Differentiating normal and deviant personality by the seven-factor personality model. In StrackS.LorrM. (Eds.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality. New York: Springer. Pp. 40–64.
25.
CraigR. J. (2005) Assessing personality and mood with adjective check list methodology: a review. International Journal of Testing, 5, 177–196.
26.
DigmanJ. M. (1990) Personality structure: the emergence of the Five-Factor Model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41,417–440.
27.
DigmanJ. M. (1997) Higher order factors of the Big-Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246–1256.
28.
EysenckH. J. (1970) The structure of human personality. (3rd ed.) London: Methuen.
29.
EysenckH. J. (1992) Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 667–673.
30.
EysenckH. J. (1993) Comment on Goldberg. American Psychologist, 48, 1299–1300.
31.
EysenckH. J. (1994) Normality, abnormality, and the three-factor model of personality. In StrackS.LorrM. (Eds.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality. New York: Springer. Pp. 3–25.
32.
FiskeD. W. (1949) Consistency of the factorial structure of personality ratings from different sources. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 44, 329–344.
33.
FiskeD. W. (1994) Two cheers for the Big-Five!Psychological Inquiry, 5, 123–124.
34.
GoldbergL. R. (1992) The development of marker variables for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26–42.
35.
GoldbergL. R. (1993) The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26–34.
36.
GoldbergL. R.DigmanJ. M. (1994) Revealing structure in data: principles of exploratory factor analysis: In StrackS.LorrM. (Eds.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality. New York: Springer. Pp. 216–242.
37.
GoldbergL. R.SaucierG. (1995) So what do you propose we use instead? A reply to Block. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 221–225.
38.
GoldbergL. R.SweeneyD.MerendaP. F.HughesJ. E. (1996) The Big-Five factor structure as an integration framework: an analysis of Clarke's AVA model. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 441–471.
39.
GoldbergL. R.SweeneyD.MerendaP. F.HughesJ. E. (1998) Demographic variables and personality: the effects of gender, age, education, and ethnic/racial status of self-descriptions of personality attributes. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 393–401.
40.
HofsteeW. K. (2003) Structures of personality traits. In MillonT.LernerM. J. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology, 5. New York: Wiley. Pp. 231–254.
41.
HoganR. (1986) Manual for the Hogan Personality Inventory (HPI). Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
42.
JacksonD. N.AshtonM. C.TomesJ. L. (1996) The six factor model of personality: facets from the Big-Five. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 391–402.
43.
KurtzJ. F.TiegreenS. B. (2003) Matters of conscience and conscientiousness: the place of ego development in the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 312–317.
44.
LorrM. (1986) Interpersonal Style Inventory: manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
45.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.Jr. (1996) Toward a new generation of personality theories: theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. In WigginsJ. S. (Ed.), Theoretical perspectives. New York: Guilford. Pp. 51–87.
46.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.Jr. (1997) Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 500–516.
47.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.Jr.MartinT. A. (2005) The NEO-PI 3: a more reliable revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84, 261–270.
48.
MerendaP. F. (1988) Toward a four-factor theory of temperament and/or personality. Journal of Psychological Assessment, 51, 367–374.
49.
MerendaP. F. (1993a) The Big-Five factors of personality: possible structure but no consensus. Psychological Reports, 72, 66.
50.
MerendaP. F. (1993b) Comparison between the manuals for the MMPI and the MMPI–2: a critique. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2, 122–126.
51.
MerendaP. F. (1995) Cross-cultural research with the five-factor theory of personality. Paper presented at the 53rd Annual Convention of the International Council of Psychologists, Taipei, Taiwan, August.
52.
MerendaP. F. (1997) A guide to the proper use of factor analysis in the conduct and reporting of research: pitfalls to avoid. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 30, 259–274.
53.
MerendaP. F. (1999) Theories, models, and factor approaches to personality, temperament, and behavioral styles: postulations and measurement in the second millennium A.D.Psychological Reports, 85, 905–932.
54.
MerendaP. F. (2003) Measurements in the future: beyond the 20th Century. Psychological Reports, 92, 209–217.
55.
MerendaP. F. (2004) Testifying successfully in a sample of five cases involving APA Ethical principles relating to use of instruments. Paper presented in symposium sponsored by Section 9 of Division 12 at APA Convention, Honolulu, HI, July 28-August 1.
56.
MerendaP. F. (2007) Psychometrics and psychometricians in the 20th and the 21st centuries: how it was in the 20th century and how it is now. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 104, 3–20.
57.
MerendaP. F.ClarkeW. V. (1959) Factor analvsis of a measure of social self. Psychological Reports, 5, 597–605.
58.
MerendaP. F.FavaJ. (1994) Role of behaviorally descriptive adjectives in description of personality. Psychological Reports, 74, 168–172.
59.
MlacicB.GoldbergL. R. (2007) An analysis of a cross-cultural personality inventory: the IPIP: Big-Five Factor markers in Croatia. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 168–172.
60.
MillerJ. D.LynamD. R. (2003) Psychology and the Five-Factor Model of Personality: a replication and extension. Journal of Personality Assessment, 81, 168–178.
61.
NormanW. T. (1963) Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574–583.
62.
PeabodyD.GoldbergL. R. (1989) Some determinants of factor structures from personality trait descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 552–561.
63.
PervinL. A. (1994) A critical analysis of current trait theory. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 103–113.
64.
SaklofskeD. H.ZeidnerM. (Eds.) (1995) International handbook of personality and intelligence. New York: Plenum.
65.
SaucierG.WilsonK. R.WarkaJ. (2007) The structure of the Retrospective Accounts of Family Environments related to the structure of personality attributes. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 295–308.
66.
TellegenA. (1985) Structures of mood and personality and their relevance to assessing anxiety, with an emphasis on self-report. In TumaA. H.MaserJ. D. (Eds.), Anxiety and the anxiety disorders. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 681–706.
67.
TellegenA. (1993) Folk concepts and psychological concepts of personality and personality disorder. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 122–130.
68.
TupesE. C.ChristalR. E. (1961) Recurring personality factors in trait ratings. Technical Report, U. S. Air Force Lackland Air Force Base, San Antonio, TX. (Reprinted in theJournal of Personality, 1992, 60, 225–251.).
69.
WallerN. G.ZavalaJ. D. (1993) Evaluating the Big Five. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 131–134.
