The knowledge-and-appraisal personality architecture has potential as a theoretical framework for understanding the formation of self-efficacy in individuals. Two patterns were observed within 14 of 17 individual persons: a pattern of strong self-efficacy was displayed across outdoor recreation activities for which a self-descriptive attribute was viewed as an asset to successful performances, and a pattern of relatively weak self-efficacy was observed across outdoor recreation activities for which the same attribute was considered a hindrance to performances. Although the theory predicts self-efficacy within individuals, more research is needed to assess why the theory is not accurate in all cases.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BanduraA. (1997) Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
2.
BorsboomD.MellenberghG. J.van HeerdenJ. (2003) The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychological Review. 110, 203–219.
3.
CervoneD. (1997) Social-cognitive mechanisms and personality coherence: self-knowledge, situational beliefs, and cross-situational coherence in perceived self-efficacy. Psychological Science, 8. 43–50.
4.
CervoneD. (1999) Bottom-up explanation in personality psychology: the case of cross-situational cohcrence. In CervoneD.ShodaY. (Eds.). The coherence of personality: socialcognitive bases of consistency, variability, and organization. New York: Guilford. Pp. 303–341.
5.
CervoneD. (2004) The architecture of personality. Psychology Review, 111, 183–204.
6.
CervoneD. (2005) Personality architecture: within-person structure and processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 423–452.
7.
CervoneD.OromH.ArtisticoD.ShadelW. G.KasselJ. D. (2007) Using a knowledge-and-appraisal model of personality architecture to understand consistency and variability in smokers' self-efficacy appraisals in high-risk situations. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 21, 44–54.
8.
CervoneD.ShadelW. G.JenciusS. (2001) Social-cognitive theory of personality assessment. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 33–51.
9.
CohenJ. (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
MolenaarP. C. M. (2004) A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2, 201–218.
11.
WiseJ. B. (2007) Testing a theory that explains how self-efficacy beliefs are formed: predicting self-efficacy appraisals across recreation activities. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 841–848.
