To estimate the personality profile for adolescents at psychopathological risk, a community sample of 762 adolescents, ages 12 to 16 years (M = 13.8, SD = 1.3), 53% boys and 47% girls, from the city of Barcelona, Spain, were tested with the Youth Self-Report and the High School Personality Questionnaire. Among this group, 140 adolescents were identified as showing symptoms of psychopathological risk for internalizing or externalizing syndromes as defined by Achenbach's theory, Analysis indicated that adolescents who scored high for internalizing and externalizing symptoms showed differing personality profiles, which also differed by sex. Boys scoring high on internalizing tended to adopt an inhibited, shy, and apprehensive behavior, while girls showed a tendency to display a more distant and cold affect and changeable emotionality. The personality pattern of boys and girls who scored high on externalizing symptoms showed both similar and different aspects. Both sexes displayed characteristics such as dominance, poor rule conformity, and low self-discipline. However, girls who scored high on externalizing symptoms also tended to show impulsiveness, social boldness, and low sensitivity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbadJ. (1998) Derivadó empírica de síndromes de banda ampia i estreta mitjançant l'instrument diagnostic Youth Self-Report [Empirical derivation of broad and narrow band syndromes using the diagnostic measure Youth Self-Report]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Methodology of Behavior Sciences, Univer. of Barcelona, Barcelona.
2.
AbadJ.FornsM.AmadorJ.MartorellB. (2000) Fiabilidad y validez del Youth Self-Report en una muestra de adolescentes [Reliability and validity of the Youth Self-Report in an adolescent group]. Psicothema, 12, 49–54.
3.
AbadJ.FornsM.GómezJ. (2002) Emotional and behavioral problems as measured by the YSR. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 149–157.
4.
AchenbachT. M. (1991a) Manual for the Youth Self-Report and 1991 YSR profile.Burlington, VT: Univer. of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
5.
AchenbachT. M. (1991b) Integrative guide for the 1991 CBCL/4-18, YSR, and TRF profiles.Burlington, VT: Univer. of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
6.
AchenbachT. M. (1993) Empirically based taxonomy.Burlington, VT: Univer. of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
7.
AchenbachT. M.EdelbrockC. S. (1978) The classification of clinical psychology: a review of empirical efforts. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1275–1301.
8.
BeckA. T. (1976) Cognitive therapy and emotional disorders.New York: International Universities Press.
CattellR. B.CattellM. D. (1989) Cuestionario de personalidad para adolescentes [Personality Questionnaire for Adolescents]. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
11.
CattellR. B.EberH. W.TatsuokaM. M. (1970) Handbook for the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire.Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality & Ability Testing.
12.
CattellR. B.KlineE. (1977) El análisis científico de la Personalidad [The scientific analysis of the personality].Madrid: Pirámide.
13.
CentorR. M.KeightleyJ. (1988) The ROC Analyzer, Version S.O.Richmond, VA: Blue Ridge Express. [Computer software]
14.
EpkinsC. C. (2000) Cognitive specificity in internalizing and externalizing problems in community and clinic-referred children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 19, 197–218.
15.
EysenckH. J. (1991) Dimensions of personality, 16, 5 or 3? Criteria for a taxonomic paradigm. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 773–790.
16.
EysenckH. J.EysenckS. B. G. (1978) Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Junior.Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
17.
GarnefskiN.KraaijV.Van EttenM. (2005) Specificity of relations between adolescents' cognitive emotion regulation strategies and Internalizing and Externalizing psychopathology. Journal of Adolescence, 28, 619–631.
18.
HoferS. M.EberH. W. (2002) Second-order factor structure of the Cattell Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire. In de RaadB.PeruginiM. (Eds.), Big Five assessment. Pp. 395–409. Toronto, Ont., Can.: Hogrefe and Huber.
19.
IvanovaM. Y.AchenbachT. M.RescorlaL. A.DumenciL.AlmqvistF.BilenbergN.BirdH.BrobergA. G.DobreanA.DöpfnerM.ErolN.FornsM.HannesdottirH.KanbayashiY.LambertM. C.LeungP.MinaeiA.MulatuM. S.NovikT.OhK-J.RoussosA.SawyerM.SimsekZ.SteinhausenH-C.WeinteaubS.Winkler MetzkeC.WolanczykT.ZilberN.ZukauskieneR.VerhulstE. C. (2007) The generalizability of the Youth Self-Report syndrome structure in 23 societies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 729–738.
20.
KarsonS.O'DellJ. W. (1989) 16 Factores de Personalidad: guía para su uso clínico [16 Personality Factor Questionnaire: guidelines of use]. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
21.
KempD. E.CenterD. B. (2003) An investigation of Eysenck's Antisocial Behavior Hypothesis in general students and students with behavior disorders. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1359–1371.
22.
KirchnerT.FornsM.AmadorJ. A. (2006) Eighteen month test-retest stability of the Youth Self Report in a sample of Catalonian adolescents. Psychological Reports, 99, 635–640.
23.
KruegerR. F.McGueM.IaconoW. G. (2001) The higher-order structure of common DSM mental disorders: internalization, externalization, and their connections to personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 1245–1259.
24.
KrugS. S. (1987) CAQ Cuestionario de Análisis Clinico [Clinical Analysis Questionnaire, manual]. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
25.
LemosS.FidalgoA. M.CalvoP.MenéndezP. (1992a) Estructura factorial de la prueba YSR y su utilidad en psicopatología infanto-juvenil. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta, 18, 883–905.
26.
LemosS.FidalgoA. M.CalvoP.MenendezP. (1992b) Validación de la escala de psicopatologia infanto-juvenil Youth Self-Report [Validity of the psychopathological scale Youth Self-Report], ClíAnica y Salud, 3, 183–194.
27.
LemosS.VallejoG.SandovalM. (2002) Estructura factorial del Youth Self-Report [Factorial structure of the Youth Self-Report). Psicothema, 14, 816–822.
28.
LeungP. M. L.WongM. M. T. (1998) Can cognitive distortions differentiate between internalizing and externalizing problems?Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 39, 263–269.
29.
NoamG. G.RecklitisC. J. (1990) The relationship between defenses and symptoms in adolescent psychopathology. Journal of Personality Assessment, 54, 311–327.
30.
RescorlaL.AchenbachT. M.IvanovaM. Y.DumenciL.AlmqvistF.BilenbergN.BirdH.BrobergA.DobreanA.DöpfnerM.ErolN.FornsM.HannesdottirH.KanbayashiY.LambertM. C.LeungP.MinaeiA.MulatuM. S.NovikT. S.OhK-J.RoussosA.SawyerM.SimsekZ.SteinhausenH-CWeintraubS.Winkler MetzkeC.WolanczykT.ZilberN.ZukauskieneR.VerhulstF. (2007) Epidemiological comparison of problems and positive qualities reported by adolescents in 24 countries. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 351–358.
31.
RönnlundM.KarlssonE. (2006) The relation between dimensions of attachment and internalizing and externalizing problems during adolescence. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 167, 47–63.
32.
SandovalM.LemosS.VallejoG. (2006) Self-reported competences and problems in Spanish adolescents: a normative study of the Youth Self-Report. Psicothema, 18, 804–809.
33.
SchnieringC. A.RapeeR. M. (2004) The relationship between automatic thoughts and negative emotions in children and adolescents: a test of the Cognitive Content-Specificity hypothesis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113, 464–470.
34.
SPSS, Inc. (1999) SPSS Base 10.0 for Windows user's guide.Chicago, IL: Author.
35.
StraussC. C. (1988) Social deficits of children with internalizing disorders. In LaheyB. B.KazdinA. E. (Eds.), Advances in clinical child psychology.Vol. 11. Pp. 159–191. New York: Plenum.
