The objective was to examine the social conditions under which subjects could attribute trait adjectives to an unknown person, the paradigm of impression-formation at zero acquaintance. The situation on which the subject had to base his judgement was a 90-sec. film clip with sound of an individual reading a weather forecast. Analysis showed traits were attributed more quickly and consistently when instructions stipulated subject should evaluate the social utility of an individual (evaluator-recruiter type instructions) rather than describe personality (psychologist-type instructions). Traits were attributed more rapidly, with more consistency and greater certainty. Interpretation of results, which generally corroborate other research, is that the judgement of another person based on a first impression is an evaluation of the social utility of that person.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbrightL.KennyD.MalloyT. E. (1988) Consensus in personality judgment at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 387–395.
2.
BarM.NetaM.LinzH. (2006) Very first impression. Emotion, 6, 269–278.
3.
BeauvoisJ. L.DuboisN. (1992) Traits as evaluative categories. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 253–270.
4.
BeauvoisJ.L.DuboisN. (2000) Affordances in social judgment: experimental proof of why it is a mistake to ignore how others behave towards a target and look solely at how the target behaves. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 59, 16–33.
5.
BeauvoisJ. L.DuboisN. (2005) Normativeness and individualism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 123–146.
6.
BerryD. S. (1990) Taking people at face value: evidence for kernel of truth hypothesis. Social Cognition, 8, 343–361.
7.
BorkenauP.LieblerA. (1992) Trait inferences: sources of validity at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 645–657.
8.
DuboisN.TarquinioC. (1998) Le traitement de l'information évaluative par des professionnels de l'évaluation sociale. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 11, 99–122.
9.
FunderD. C. (1995) On the accuracy of personality judgment: a realistic approach, Psychological Review, 102, 652–670.
10.
FunderD. C. (1999) Personality judgment: a realistic approach to person perception.New York: Academic Press.
11.
FunderD. C.ColvinC. R. (1988) Friends and strangers: acquaintanceship, agreement, and the accuracy of personality judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 149–158.
12.
HassinR.TropeY. (2000) Facing faces: studies on the cognitive aspects of physiognomy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 837–852.
13.
JenningsT.PalmerJ. K.ThomasA. (2004) Effects of performance context on processing speed and performance ratings. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18, 453–463.
14.
Le BarbenchonE.CambonL.LavigneF. (2005) Désirabilité sociale et utilité sociale de 308 adjectifs et 297 professions. L'année Psychologique, 2, 307–322.
15.
MignonA.MollaretP. (2002) Applying the affordance conception of traits: a person perception study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1327–1334.
16.
MollaretP.MignonA. (2003) L'apprentissage d'un mode évaluatif vs descriptif de jugement des personnes: conséquences sur l'estimation des différences individuelles. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 59, 22–29.
17.
PeabodyD. (1962) Two components in bipolar scales: direction and extremeness. Psychological Review, 69, 65–73.
18.
PeetersG. (1992) Evaluative meanings of adjectives in vitro and in context: some theoretical implications and practical consequences of positive-negative asymmetry and behavioral-adaptive concepts of evaluation. Psychologica Belgica, 32, 211–231.
19.
ShroutP. E. (1993) Analyzing consensus in personality judgments: a variance components approach. Journal of Personality, 61, 769–788.
20.
VonkR. (1993) Individual differences and common dimensions in implicit personality theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 209–226.
21.
WatsonD. (1989) Strangers' ratings of the five robust personality factors: evidence of a surprising convergence with self-report. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 120–128.
22.
WenturaD.RotharmundK.BakP. (2000) Automatic vigilance: the attention-grabbing power of approach- and avoidance-related social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1024–1037.
23.
WigginsJ. S. (1979) A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: the interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, il, 395–412.
24.
ZebrowitzL. A.CollinsM. A. (1997) Accurate social perception at zero acquaintance: the affordances of a Gibsonian approach. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 204–223.
