In this study, 639 native Dutch shoppers (279 men and 360 women) entering a department store, supermarket, or mall were approached with a request to sign a petition for animal welfare. The request was accompanied by a smile or a neutral expression displayed by a woman or a man. Results showed that a smile was reciprocated with a smile, especially by female participants. Participants were more likely to comply with the request of a woman than of a man. It was also found that smiling of the participant and compliance were related and that the reciprocation of a smile increased the likelihood of compliance with the request.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaronR. A. (1971) Behavioral effects of interpersonal attraction: compliance with requests from liked and disliked others. Psychonomic Science, 25, 325–326.
2.
BurgoonJ.BirkT.PfauM. (1990) Nonverbal behaviors, persuasion, and credibility. Human Communication Research, 17, 140–169.
3.
ByrneD. (1971) The attraction paradigm.New York: Academic Press.
4.
CialdiniR. B. (2001) Influence: science and practice. (4th ed.) Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
5.
EaglyA. H. (1987) Sex differences in social behavior: a social-role interpretation.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
Eibl-EibesfeldtI. (1989) Human ethology.New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
EmswillerT.DeauxK.WillitsJ. E. (1971) Similarity, sex and requests for small favors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1, 284–291.
9.
HallJ. (1984) Nonverbal sex differences: communication accuracy and expressive style.Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins Univer. Press.
10.
HenleyN. (1977) Body politics: power, sex and nonverbal communication.New York: Simon and Schuster.
11.
HinszV. B.TomhaveJ. A. (1991) Smile and (half) the world smiles with you, frown and you frown alone. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 586–592.
12.
JorgensonD. O. (1978) Nonverbal assessment of attitudinal affect with the smile-return technique. Journal of Social Psychology, 106, 173–179.
13.
KleinkeC. R. (1977) Compliance to requests made by gazing and touching experimenters in field settings. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 218–223.
14.
LafranceM.HechtM. A.PaluckE. L. (2003) The contingent smile: a meta-analysis of sex differences in smiling. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 305–334.
15.
LauS. (1982) The effect of smiling on person perception. Journal of Social Psychology, 117, 63–67.
16.
NesbittM.PennN. L. (2000) Gender stereotypes after thirty years: a replication of Rosenkrantz, et al. (1968). Psychological Reports, 87, 493–511.
17.
OttaE.AbrosioF. F.HoshinoR. L. (1996) Reading a smiling face: messages conveyed by various forms of smiling. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82, 1111–1121.
18.
OttaE.PerreiraB.DelevatiN.PimentelC. O.PiresC. (1994) The effects of smiling and of head tilting on person perception. Journal of Psychology, 128, 323–332.
19.
ReisH.McDougalW.MonesterW.BersteinS.ClarkS.SeidlE.FrancoM.GioiosoE.FreemanL.RadoaneK. (1990) What is smiling is beautiful and good. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 259–267.
20.
SmithD. E.GierJ. A.WillisF. N. (1982) Interpersonal touch and compliance with a marketing request. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 3, 35–38.
21.
SolomonH.Zener SolomonL.ArnoneM. M.MaurB. J.RedaR. M.RothE. O. (1981) Anonymity and helping. Journal of Social Psychology, 113, 37–43.
22.
TelS. H. (2001) The reciprocation of smiling. Journal of Social Psychology, 129, 711–712.
23.
VrugtA.KerkstraA. (1984) Sex differences in nonverbal communication. Semiotica, 50, 1–41.
24.
VrugtA.Van EechoudM. (2002) Smiling and self-presentation of men and women for job photographs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 419–431.
25.
WillisF. N.Jr.HammH. K. (1980) The use of interpersonal touch in securing compliance. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 5, 49–55.
