Sociometric Effects on Rejection of Children in Grade 2 Given a Multifocal Intervention Involving Teachers,Parents,and Children in One Brazilian School
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2007
Sociometric Effects on Rejection of Children in Grade 2 Given a Multifocal Intervention Involving Teachers,Parents,and Children in One Brazilian School
Current literature favors developing social competence in childhood, especially preventing peer rejection. This study presents the effects of a preventive multifocal intervention at one Brazilian elementary school. Participants were second graders (N = 255), their teachers (n = 7), and 13 caregivers. Teachers referred 52 children to overcome interaction problems. Baseline and postintervention sociometric assessment assigned every second grader to one of five social status groups (rejected, neglected, median, popular, and controversial). Trained teachers developed an education program with second graders. A psychologist treated 13 referred children and caregivers (Cognitive Behavioral Child Therapy+Parent Training). The referred group of 13 at baseline showed a significantly higher percentage of rejection and fewer popular children. The nonreferred group postprogram showed no significant change on rejection, however, referred treated groups showed a higher percentage of popular children whereas the control group showed a higher percentage of rejected children
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ancona-LopezM. A. (1983) Caraterísticas da clientela de clínicas-escola de psicologia em São Paulo. Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia, 35, 78–92.
2.
BaraldiD. M.SilvaresE. F. M. (2003) Treino de habilidades sociais em grupo com crianças agressivas associado à orientação dos pais: análise empírica de urna proposta de atendimento. In Del PretteA.Del PretteZilda (Eds.), Habilidades sociais, desenvolvimento e aprendizagem: questões conceituais, avaliação e intervenção.Campinas, Brasil, Atomo/Alínea. Pp. 235–258.
3.
BiglanA.MetzlerC. W.AryD. V. (1994) Increasing the prevalence of successful children: the case for community intervention research. The Behavior Analyst, 17, 335–351.
4.
CoieJ. D.DodgeK.CoppotelliH. (1982) Dimensions and types of social status: a cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557–570.
5.
CrissM. M.PettitG. S.BatesJ. E.DodgeK. A.LappA. L. (2002) Family adversity, positive peer relationships, and children's externalizing behavior: a longitudinal perspective on risk and resilience. Child Development, 73, 1220–1237.
6.
DumasJ. E. (1994) Interactional correlates of treatment outcome in behavioral parent training. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 946–954.
7.
KuhneM.WienerJ. (2000) Stability of social status of children with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23, 64–76.
8.
LochmanJ. E.WellsK. C. (2004) The coping power program for preadolescent aggressive boys and their parents: outcome effects at the 1-year follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(4), 571–578.
9.
MashE. J. (1998) Treatment of child and family disturbance: a behavioral-systems perspective. In MashE. J.BarkleyR. A. (Eds.), Treatment of childhood disorders.New York: Guilford. Pp. 3–51.
10.
McFadyen-KetchumS.DodgeK. A. (1998) Problems in social relationships. In MashE. J.BarkleyB. A. (Eds.), Treatment of childhood disorders.New York: Guilford. Pp. 338–365.
11.
MeloM.SilvaresE. E. M. (2003) Grupo cognitivo-comportamental com familias de crianças sem habilidades sociais e com déficits acadêmicos. Temas em Psicologia, 11, 122–133.
12.
Miller-JohnsonS.CoieJ.Maumary-GremaudA.Bierman, K., & the Behavior Problem Prevention Research Group. (2002) Peer rejection and aggression and early starter models of conduct disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 217–230.
13.
PattersonG. R.DebarysheB. D.RamseyE. (1989) A developmental perspective on antisocial behavior. American Psychologist, 44, 329–335.
14.
PattersonG. R.ReidJ. B.DishionT. J. (1992) Antisocial boys.Eugene, OR: Castalia.
15.
SandstromM. J. (2003) Sociomctric status and children's peer experiences: use of the daily diary method. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 427–452.
16.
SilvaresE. E. M. (1994) O papel preventivo das clínicas-escola no seu atendimento psicológico a crianças. Temas de Psicologia, 2, 87–97.
17.
SnyderJ.CramerA.AfrankJ.PattersonG. R. (2005) The contributions of ineffective discipline and parental hostile attributions of child misbehavior to the development of conduct problems at home and school. Developmental Psychology, 41, 30–41.
18.
SpenceS. H.MatosM. G. (2000) Intervenções preventivas com crianças e adolescentes. In MatosM. G.SimõesC., & CarvalhosaS. F. (Eds.), Desenvolvimento de competencias de vida na prevenção do desajustamento social.Lisboa, Portugal: Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Instituto de Reinserção Social, Ministério da Justiça.
19.
TrianesM. V.MuñozA. (1994) Programa de educación social y afectiva.Málaga: Delegación de Educación Junta de Andalucía.
20.
Webster-StrattonC. (1998) Preventing conduct problems in Head Start children: strengthening parenting competencies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 715–730.
21.
Webster-StrattonC.ReidM. J. (2004) Strengthening social and emotional competence in young children—the foundation for early school readiness and success: Incredible Years classroom social skills and problem-solving curriculum. Infants and Young Children, 17, 96–13.
22.
Webster-StrattonC.ReidM. J.HammondM. (2001a) Preventing conduct problems, promoting social competence: a parent and teacher training partnership in Head Start. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 30, 283–302.
23.
Webster-StrattonC.ReidM. J.HammondM. (2001b) Social skills and problem solving training for children with early-onset conduct problems: who benefits?Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 943–952.
