The test-retest stability of the Slosson Full-Range Intelligence Test by Algozzine, Eaves, Mann, and Vance was investigated with test scores from a sample of 103 students. With a mean interval of 13.7 mo. and different examiners for each of the two test administrations, the test-retest reliability coefficients for the Full-Range IQ, Verbal Reasoning, Abstract Reasoning, Quantitative Reasoning, and Memory were .93, .85, .80, .80, and .83, respectively. Mean differences from the test-retest scores were not statistically significantly different for any of the scales. Results suggest that Slosson scores are stable over time even when different examiners administer the test.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlgozzineB.EavesR.MannL.VanceR. H. (1988) Cognitive Levels Test.Norristown, PA: Arete.
BellN. I.RuckerM.FinchA. J. (2002) Concurrent validity of the Slosson Full-Range Intelligence Test: comparison with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-third edition and the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement-Revised. Psychology in the Schools, 39, 31–38.
4.
ConnollyA. J. (1988) KeyMath-Revised.Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
5.
EavesR. C. (1987) CLT reliability and validity studies: Part 1. In CLT technical reports.Norristown, PA: Arete.
6.
KavesR. C. (1988) CLT reliability and validity studies: Part 2. In CLT technical reports.Norristown, PA: Arete.
7.
EavesR. C. (1992) Diagnostic accuracy of the Cognitive Levels Test, the KeyMath-Revised and the Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised. Diagnostique, 17, 163–175.
8.
EavesR. C. (1995) The Visual Similes Test II—Affective and Cognitive Forms.Opelika, AL: Small World.
9.
EavesR. C.Campbell-WhatleyG.DunnC.ReillyA.Tate-BraxtonC. (1994) Comparison of the Slosson Full-Range Intelligence Test and teacher judgment as predictors of students' academic achievement. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 12, 381–392.
10.
EavesR. C.CutchenM. (1990) The construct validity of the Cognitive Levels Test and the Academic Levels Test when compared with the WISC–R and PIAT for a group of adjudicated delinquents. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 61–73.
11.
EavesR. C.DarchC.MannL.VanceH. R. (1989) Cognition and academic achievement: the relationship of the Cognitive Levels Test to the KeyMath and Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 973–983.
12.
EavesR. C.DarchC.MannL.VanceH. R. (1990) The Cognitive Levels Test: its relationship with reading and mathematics achievement. Psychology in the Schools, 27, 22–28.
13.
EavesR. C.SubotnikR. (1989) A longitudinal, criterion-related validity study of the Cognitive Levels Test for a group of highly gifted students. Diagnostique, 14, 79–88.
14.
EavesR. C.VanceH. R.MannL.Parker-BohannonA. (1990) Cognition and academic achievement: the relationship of the Cognitive Levels Test, the KeyMath-Revised, and Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised. Psychology in the Schools, 27, 311–318.
15.
EavesR. C.WilliamsF.WinchesterK.DarchC. (1994) Using teacher judgment and IQ to estimate reading and mathematics achievement in a remedial-reading program. Psychology in the Schools, 31, 261–272.
16.
LeeS. W.UnruhL.FordL.MaceW. (1991) The reliability and validity of the Cognitive Levels Test (CLT) for preschool children. Diagnostique, 16, 94–100.
17.
OvertonT.AppersonJ. (1989) Comparison of scores on the Cognitive Levels Test and the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Diagnostique, 14, 159–162.
18.
Parker-BohannonA. (1990) Criterion-related validity of the Cognitive Levels Test/Academic Levels Test as compared with the Stanford Achievement Test/Otis-Lennon School Ability Test. Unpublished master's thesis, Auburn Univer., AL.
19.
ReynoldsF. L.HumphreysS. (nd) Concurrent validity of the Cognitive Levels Test and the WISCR based on a sample of exceptional children and youth. (Unpublished manuscript, Johnson City, TN).
20.
ReynoldsF. L.HumphreysS. (1989) A comparison of the Cognitive Levels Test and the Academic Levels Test with the WISCR, K-ABC, and Woodcock-Johnson. Symposium presented at the 67th Annual Convention of the Council for Exceptional Children, San Francisco, CA.
21.
RushT. (1990) Correlation between the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children and the Cognitive Levels Test. (Unpublished manuscript, Cheyenne, WY).
22.
U.S. BUREAU OF THE CENSUS. (1963) Methodology and scores of socioeconomic status. Working paper No. 15. Washington, DC: Author.
23.
VanceB.MayesL.EavesR. C. (1991) Correlations between the Cognitive Levels Test and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72, 1249–1250.
24.
VanceB.MayesL.EavesR. C.HomosN. A. (1991) The concurrent validity of the Cognitive Levels Test with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised for a sample of referred children and youth. Psychology in the Schools, 28, 100–105.
25.
VanceB.MayesL. M.EavesR. C.MorrisonS. (1993) Concurrent validity of the Cognitive Levels Test with measures of achievement for a sample of referred children and youth. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49, 72–79.
26.
WoodcockR. W. (1987) Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised examiner's manual.Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
