The present cross-cultural study examined the relationship between deductive reasoning and creativity among college students (M age = 20.4 yr., SD=.6) from Hong Kong (n = 39) and the United States (n = 38). Participants performed tasks designed to measure deductive reasoning, creative writing, and insight problem-solving, all in verbal form. No correlation was found between the performance for deductive reasoning and creativity as measured by creative writing. Insight problem-solving performance correlated significantly with that for both reasoning and creativity. Significant cultural differences favoring the American participants were only found on the creative writing and insight problem-solving tasks, both of which supposedly involve creative thinking. There seems to be cultural dependence for creativity but not for deductive reasoning which suggests a qualification of a strong cultural-relevance view positing pervasive cultural influences on human thinking processes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmabileT. M. (1983) The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer Verlag.
2.
AmabileT. M. (1996) Creativity in context: update to “The social psychology of creativity.”Boulder, CO: Westview.
3.
AnsburgP. I.HillK. (2003) Creative and analytic thinkers differ in their use of attentional resources. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1141–1152.
4.
ChenC.KasofJ.HimselA.DmitrievaJ.DongQ.XueG. (2005) Effects of explicit instruction to “be creative” across domains and cultures. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 89–110.
5.
ChenC.KasofJ.HimselA.GreenbergerE.DongQ.XueG. (2002) Creativity in drawings of geometric shapes: a cross-cultural examination with the Consensual Assessment Technique. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 171–187.
6.
CicchettiD. V.SparrowS. S. (1981) Development of criteria for establishing the inter-rater reliability of specific items in a given inventory: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 127–137.
7.
CicchettiD. V.ShowalterD.RosenheckR. (1997) A new method for assessing inter-examiner agreement when multiple ratings are made on a single subject: applications to the assessment of neuropsychiatric symptomatology. Psychiatry Research, 72, 51–63.
8.
DavisM. (2001) The influence of cultural styles of reasoning on attitudinal and cognitive responses to persuasive messages. Unpublished dissertation, Univer. of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
9.
de BonoE. (1976) The use of lateral thinking. New York: Penguin.
10.
GearyD. C.HamsonC. O.ChenG.LiuF.HoardM. K.SalthouseT. A. (1997) Computational and reasoning abilities in arithmetic: cross-generational change in China and the United States. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 425–430.
11.
JaquishG. A.RippleR. E. (1985) A life-span developmental cross-cultural study of divergent thinking abilities. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 20, 1–11.
12.
JellenH. U.KlausK. (1989) Assessing creative potential worldwide: the first cross-cultural application of the Test for Creative Thinking-Drawing Production (TCT-DP). Gifted Education International, 6, 78–86.
13.
Johnson-LairdP. N. (1987) Reasoning, imagining, and creating. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 40, 121–129.
14.
Johnson-LairdP. N. (1993) Human and machine thinking. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15.
LavricA.ForstmeierS.RipponG. (2000) Differences in working memory involvement in analytical and creative tasks: an ERP study. Neuroreport, 11, 1613–1618.
16.
MattheisF.SpoonerW. E.CobleC. R.TakemuraS.MatsumotoS.MatsumotoK.YoshidaA. (1992) A study of the logical thinking skills and integrated process skills of junior high school students in North Carolina and Japan. Science Education, 76, 211–222.
17.
NgK. (2005) Creativity, learning goal and self-construal: a cross-cultural investigation. Korean Journal of Thinking & Problem Solving, 15, 65–80.
18.
NiazM.de NunezG. Saud (1991) The relationship of mobility-fixity to creativity, formal reasoning, and intelligence. Journal of Creative Behavior, 25, 205–217.
19.
NisbettR. E.PengK.ChoiI.NorenzayanA. (2001) Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291–310.
20.
NiuW.SternbergR. J. (2001) Cultural influences on artistic creativity and its evaluation. International Journal of Psychology, 36, 225–241.
21.
NiuW.SternbergR. J. (2002) Contemporary studies on the concept of creativity: the East and the West. Journal of Creative Behavior, 36, 269–288.
22.
NorenzayanA.SmithE. E.KimB. J.NisbettR. E. (2002) Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning. Cognitive Science, 26, 653–684.
23.
PornrungrojC. (1992) A comparison of creativity test scores between Thai children in a Thai culture and Thai-American children who were born and reared in an American culture. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Illinois State Univer, IL.
24.
PretzJ. E. (2001) Implicit and explicit views of transfer in insight problem solving. 13th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Society, Toronto, Canada, June.
25.
RipsL. J. (1994) Deductive reasoning. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Handbook of perception and cognition: thinking and problem-solving. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 149–178.
26.
RudowiczE.LokD.KittoJ. (1995) Use of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking in an exploratory study of creativity in Hong Kong primary school children: a cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Psychology, 30, 417–430.
27.
RudowiczE.YueX. (2000) Concepts of creativity: similarities and differences among Mainland, Hong Kong and Taiwanese Chinese. Journal of Creative Behavior, 34, 175–192.
28.
RuncoM. A. (2002) Idea evaluation, divergent thinking, and creativity. In RuncoM., Critical creative process. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Pp. 69–94.
29.
ShawG.BrownG. (1990) Laterality and creativity concomitants of attention problems. Development Neuropsychology, 6, 39–57.
30.
SternbergR. J. (1997) Thinking styles. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univer. Press.
31.
SternbergR. J.LubartT. L. (1999) The concept of creativity: prospects and paradigms. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge Univer. Press. Pp. 3–15.
32.
SternbergR. J.O'HaraL. A. (1999) Creativity and intelligence. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge Univer. Press. Pp. 251–272.
33.
YangY.BringsjordS. (2003) Some initial empirical justifications for mental metalogic: the case of reasoning with quantifiers and predicates. In AltermanR.KirshD. (Eds.), The Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 1275–1280.
34.
YangY.Johnson-LairdP. N. (2001) Mental models and logical reasoning problems in GRE. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7, 308–316.
35.
YangY.ZhaoY.ZengJ.GuoJ.JuS.BringsjordS. (2005) Some empirical justifications for the universalness of the mental logic/models paradigm. In BaraB.BarsalouL.BucciarelliM. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 2399–2404.
