Recent findings concerning mathematics assessment indicate that students in Japan consistently score above international averages. Researchers have examined specific mathematics beliefs and instructional strategies associated with mathematics achievement for students in Japan. This study examined relationships among self-beliefs, classroom instructional strategies, and mathematics achievement for a large national sample of students (N = 4,207) from the TIMSS 2003 international sample of fourth graders in Japan. Several significant relationships between mathematics beliefs and test scores were found; a number of classroom teaching strategies were also significantly associated with test scores. However, multiple regression using the complete set of five mathematics beliefs and five instructional strategies explained only 25.1% of the variance in mathematics achievement test scores.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ChenC.StevensonH. W. (1995) Motivation and mathematics achievement: a comparative study of Asian-American, Caucasian-American, and East Asian high school students. Child Development, 66, 1215–1234.
2.
EllingerT. R.BeckhamE. M. (1997) South Korea: placing education on top of the family agenda. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 624–625.
3.
FidlerM. (1999) Chipping away at proofs: a cooperative approach. Mathematics Teacher, 92, 565–567.
4.
FoyP.JoncasM. (2004) TIMSS 2003 sampling design. In MartinM. O.MullisI. V. S.ChrostowskiS. J. (Eds.), TIMSS 2003 technical report. Chestnut Hill, MA: International Study Center, Boston College. Pp. 108–123.
5.
GonzalezE. J.GaliaJ.LiI. (2004) Scaling methods and procedures for the TIMSS 2003 mathematics and science scales. In MartinM. O.MullisI. V. S.ChrostowskiS. J. (Eds.), TIMSS 2003 technical report. Chestnut Hill, MA: International Study Center, Boston College. Pp. 252–273.
HouseJ. D. (2001) Relationship between instructional activities and mathematics achievement of adolescent students in Japan: findings from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). International Journal of Instructional Media, 28, 93–105.
8.
HouseJ. D. (2002) Instructional practices and mathematics achievement of adolescent students in Chinese Taipei: results from the TIMSS 1999 assessment. Child Study Journal, 32, 157–178.
9.
HouseJ. D. (2004) The effects of homework activities and teaching strategies for new mathematics topics on achievement of adolescent students in Japan: results from the TIMSS 1999 assessment. International Journal of Instructional Media, 31, 199–210.
10.
HouseJ. D. (2005) Mathematics beliefs and achievement of adolescent students in Japan: results from the TIMSS 1999 assessment. Psychological Reports, 97, 717–720.
11.
HouseJ. D. (2006) Mathematics beliefs and achievement of elementary-school students in Japan and the United States: results from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 167, 31–45.
12.
HouseJ. D. (2006) Mathematics beliefs, instructional strategies, and algebra achievement of adolescent students in Japan: results from the TIMSS 1999 assessment. International Journal of Instructional Media, 33, 443–462.
13.
KollerO.BaumertJ.SchnabelK. (2001) Does interest matter? The relationship between academic interest and achievement in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 448–470.
14.
LeikinR.ZaslavskyO. (1997) Facilitating student interactions in mathematics in a cooperative learning setting. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 331–354.
15.
LeungF. K. S. (2001) In search of an East Asian identity in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47, 35–51.
16.
MartinM. O. (2005) TIMSS 2003 user guide for the international database. Chestnut Hill, MA: International Study Center, Boston College.
17.
MullisI. V. S.MartinM. O.GonzalezE. J.ChrostowskiS. J. (2004) TIMSS 2003 International Mathematics Report. Chestnut Hill, MA: International Study Center, Boston College.
18.
PajaresF.GrahamL. (1999) Self-efficacy, motivation constructs, and mathematics performance of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 124–139.
19.
PerryM. (2000) Explanation of mathematical concepts in Japanese, Chinese, and U.S. first- and fifth-grade classrooms. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 181–207.
20.
RossK. N. (1979) An empirical investigation of sampling errors in educational survey research. Journal of Educational Statistics, 4, 24–40.
21.
SawadaD. (1999) Mathematics as problem-solving: a Japanese way. Teaching Children Mathematics, 6(1), 54–58.
22.
SmithNeidorf T.GardenR. (2004) Developing the TIMSS 2003 mathematics and science assessment and scoring guides. In MartinM. O.MullisI. V. S.ChrostowskiS. J. (Eds.), TIMSS 2003 technical report. Chestnut Hill, MA: International Study Center, Boston College. Pp. 22–65.
23.
StiglerJ. W.GallimoreR.HiebertJ. (2000) Using video surveys to compare classrooms and teaching across cultures: examples and lessons from the TIMSS Video Studies. Educational Psychologist, 35, 87–100.
24.
WangL.FanX. (1997) The effect of cluster sampling design in survey research on the standard error statistic. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, Chicago, IL, March.
