The Situational Outlook Questionnaire has been in use for many years as an assessment of the climate that supports change, innovation, and creativity. This study reports the descriptive statistics, internal consistency, factor structure, and other psychometric results from a sample of 4,730 respondents. Further areas for improvement of the questionnaire and assessment approach are identified.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CabraJ. F. (1996) Examining the reliability and factor structure of the Climate for Innovation Questionnaire. Unpublished master's thesis, Center for Studies in Creativity, State Univer. College at Buffalo.
2.
CostelloA. B. (2005) Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10, 1–9.
3.
DenisonD. R. (1996) What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native's view on a decade of paradigm wars. Academy of Management Review, 21, 619–694.
EkvallG. (1971) Creativity at the place of work: a study of suggestors and suggestion systems in the Swedish mechanical industry. Stockholm: PAcouncil.
6.
EkvallG. (1983) Climate, structure and innovativeness of organizations: a theoretical framework and an experiment. Stockholm, Sweden: FArådet-The Swedish Council for Management and Work Life Issues (Report No. 1)
7.
EkvallG. (1987) The climate metaphor in organization theory. In BassB.DrenthP. (Eds.), Advances in organizational psychology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Pp. 177–190.
8.
EkvallG. (1991) The organizational culture of idea-management: a creative climate for the management of ideas. In HenryJ.WalkerD. (Eds.), Managing innovation. London: Sage. Pp. 73–79.
9.
EkvallG. (1996) The organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 105–123.
10.
EkvallG. (1997) Organizational conditions and levels of creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 6, 195–205.
11.
EkvallG.ArvonenJ.Waldenström-LindbladI. (1983) Creative organizational climate: construction and validation of a measuring instrument. Stockholm, Sweden: The Swedish Council for Management and Organizational Behaviour (Report No. 2)
12.
FerrandoP. J.Lorenzo-SevaU. (2000) Unrestricted versus restricted factor analysis of multidimensional test items: some aspects of the problem and some suggestions. Psicológica, 21, 301–323.
13.
GrivasC. C. (1996) An exploratory investigation of the relationship of cognitive style with perceptions of creative climate. Unpublished master's thesis, Center for Studies in Creativity, State Univer. College at Buffalo.
14.
HubermanM.MilesM. B. (Eds.) (2002) The qualitative researcher's companion. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
IsaksenS. G.EkvallG. (2006) Assessing your context for change: a technical manual for the Situational Outlook Questionnaire. Buffalo, NY: The Creative Problem Solving Group.
16.
IsaksenS. G.KaufmannG. (1990) Adaptors and innovators: a discriminant analysis of the perceptions of the psychological climate for creativity. Studia Psychologica: The Journal for Basic Research in Psychological Sciences, 32, 129–141.
17.
IsaksenS. G.LauerK. J. (1999) Relationship between cognitive style and individual psychological climate: reflections on a previous study. Studia Psychologica, 41, 177–191.
18.
IsaksenS. G.LauerK. J. (2001) Convergent validity of the Situational Outlook Questionnaire: discriminating levels of perceived support for creativity. North American Journal of Psychology, 3, 31–40.
19.
IsaksenS. G.LauerK. J. (2002) The climate for creativity and change in teams. Creativity and Innovation Management Journal, 11, 74–86.
20.
IsaksenS. G.LauerK. J.EkvallG. (1999) Situational Outlook Questionnaire: a measure of the climate for creativity and change. Psychological Reports, 85, 665–674.
21.
IsaksenS. G.LauerK. J.EkvallG.BritzA. (2001) Perceptions of the best and worst climates for creativity: preliminary validation evidence for the Situational Outlook Questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 171–184.
22.
IsaksenS. G.LauerK. J.MurdockM. C.DorvalK. B.PuccioG. J. (1995) Situational Outlook Questionnaire: understanding the climate for creativity and change (SOQ)—a technical manual, Buffalo, NY: Creative Problem Solving Group-Buffalo.
23.
IsaksenS. G.TiddJ. (2006) Meeting the innovation challenge: leadership for transformation and growth. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
24.
LauerK. J. (1994) The assessment of creative climate: an investigation of Ekvall's Creative Climate Questionnaire. Unpublished master's thesis, Center for Studies in Creativity, State Univer. College at Buffalo.
25.
LauerK. J.IsaksenS. G. (2001) Driving through changing climates: using the SOQ to direct organizational change. In BuijsJ.Van der LugtR.Van der MeerH. (Eds.), Idea Safari: Proceedings of the Seventh European Conference in Creativity and innovation. Enschede, The Netherlands: Twente Univer. Press. Pp. 231–238.
26.
LeslieK.LochM.SchaningerB. (2006) Managing your organization by the evidence. The McKinsey Quarterly, 3, 67–75.
27.
RussellD. W. (2002) In search of underlying dimensions: the use (and abuse) of factor analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1629–1646.
28.
SobieckM. A. (1996) Examination of cross-site narrative responses on the CIQ and SOQ. Unpublished master's thesis, Center for Studies in Creativity, State Univer. College at Buffalo.
29.
SperanziniG. D. (1997) Understanding the impact of a climate intervention: debriefing the Situational Outlook Questionnaire (SOQ). Unpublished master's thesis, Center for Studies in Creativity, State Univer. College at Buffalo.
30.
TalbotR. J.CooperC. L.BarrowS. (1992) Creativity and stress. Creativity and Innovation Management, 1, 183–193.
31.
TurnipseedD. (1994) The relationship between the social environment of organizations and the climate for innovation and creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 3, 184–195.
